I suppose that if you spend $billions$, they should get something! Better
the house then anything I guess. With only house control, I wonder how do
they plan on paying back the foreign campaign investors?

How much will the spend to buy the presidency?

I'm pretty sure Limpballs and Bleck are already are payed back for the
few hundred $$$ they invested.

On Nov 3, 1:18*pm, FullName wrote:
I suppose that if you spend $billions$, they should get something! [drool]

LOL!!! the pussytards demonkraps won by losing!!!!

On Nov 3, 10:18*am, FullName wrote:
I suppose that if you spend $billions$, they should get something! Better
the house then anything I guess. With only house control, I wonder how do
they plan on paying back the foreign campaign investors?

How much will the spend to buy the presidency?

I'm pretty sure Limpballs and Bleck are already are payed back for the
few hundred $$$ they invested.

Say what you will -but- The Obama Agenda
is =D=O=A= as of 3 JAN 2011

Starting Today the Democrats will be using the
"R" Word {Recession} and "D" Words {Depression}
and trying to Blame the Republicans for . . .
the Great Obama Depression of 2010;
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...b4a5cba3a3f8df

and the Great Obama Depression of 2011;
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...0c97076e3f00b6

and the Great Obama Depression of 2012;
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...f06310dd8e137f

and the Great Obama Depression of 2013;
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...da118b57efdce1

and the Great Obama Depression of 2014;
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...47a644a9b4bb3b

and the Great Obama Depression of 2015;
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...2d94877b3e7fcb

and the Great Obama Depression of 2016;
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...71cc58fd455c6c

and the Great Obama Depression of 2017;
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...6e9e7196c4f7e5

and the Great Obama Depression of 2018;
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...b4d19b5c461925

and the Great Obama Depression of 2019;
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...260672c73bd6bc

and the Great Obama Depression of 2020;
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.p...6e9e7196c4f7e5

Two Years After Obama's Election :
The Verdict on Prez Obama :
O.B.A.M.A. = One Big Absolute Mistake America !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...f8f0be4a2b20bc
A Culture of National Debt and Obama-Tax-Slavery©

On 11/3/2010 3:35 PM, C K Whatchamacallit wrote:

...
Bingo! Some will never understand because they're too wrapped up in the
blame game. If everyone would step back and watch, they would learn a lot
from observation.


Yeah. Like the "sports-game-mentality" you pick a team and root for 'em!

Team A = republi-crats (AKA, repulsivecants)
Team B = demo-cans (AKA, dummycraps)

But dammit man, can't they come up with better cheerleaders? That damn
palin looks like a amish bitch out of costume and a LOT more stupid ...
the stupid part is OK. Easier to get in their pants that way ... but
dammit man, I want no part of those pants! ROFLOL

Regards,
JS

On 11/3/2010 4:06 PM, wrote:

...
I think that we were saved from the cold gray clouds
of a McCain depression that would have surely happened.

Yeah, I guess some will prefer a ohblahblah depression over a
no-brain-mccain depression ... I'd rather have neither ... just me, I guess.

Regards,
JS

On 11/3/2010 4:04 PM, wrote:

...
The bright side is there was a lot of money spent by
republicans that lost such as Meg Whitman (ebay) and
Carly Fiorena. This is money that went into the
economy to help keep it going. Spending by those
that have it is what is needed in the economy since
they obviously don't want the govt to do it.

The bad news? We get
jerry-homosexual-brown-criminal-treasonous-public-servant-b*st*rd back
for a second go around of "LET'S SPEND YOUR TAX DOLLARS ON PRETTY CHIT!"
I hate that game ...

Regards,
JS

On 11/3/2010 4:10 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 11/3/2010 3:35 PM, C K Whatchamacallit wrote:

...
Bingo! Some will never understand because they're too wrapped up in the
blame game. If everyone would step back and watch, they would learn a lot
from observation.


Yeah. Like the "sports-game-mentality" you pick a team and root for 'em!

Team A = republi-crats (AKA, repulsivecants)
Team B = demo-cans (AKA, dummycraps)

But dammit man, can't they come up with better cheerleaders? That damn
palin looks like a amish bitch out of costume and a LOT more stupid ...
the stupid part is OK. Easier to get in their pants that way ... but
dammit man, I want no part of those pants! ROFLOL

Regards,
JS


Did I mention she has all the graceful movement of an Alaskan Moose?

Chuckle,
JS

On 11/3/2010 1:39 PM, buzz wrote:

...

I really don't care if they are republi-crat or demo-can ... unless one
would be better for target practice ...

Regards,
JS

On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:58:14 -0700, Werner wrote:

On Nov 3, 1:18Â*pm, FullName wrote:
I suppose that if you spend $billions$, they should get something!
Better the house then anything I guess. With only house control, I
wonder how do they plan on paying back the foreign campaign investors?

How much will the spend to buy the presidency?

I'm pretty sure Limpballs and Bleck are already are payed back for the
few hundred $$$ they invested.


If you look at the numbers you'll see that Dems outspent Repubs but
still lost the House.

Anyway, if politicians weren't worth buying there wouldn't be spending.
http://www.EndIt.info

This link does not reference the 527 groups where repugs spent 10-1

On Nov 3, 10:18*am, FullName wrote:
I suppose that if you spend $billions$, they should get something!

1. Democrats spent more.
2. The Democrats didn't have that many seats up for re-election. in
2012, you guys got 26 to defend. Yikes.