Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's time for a new receiver, and can't decide between
the FRG100B and R75. Right now, aesham.com has both (including the DSP unit for the R75) for the same price. I've looked at online reviews and comparisons.... some folks like one, some folks like the other, and I'm stumped. Also live a couple of hundred miles from nowhere, so going to a dealer to listen to them is not a possibility. Any guidance? -fb- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
R75 with DSP. You get sync and the DSP plus a keypad. The Frog has no
keypad. Having had both not being a fan of either the R75 is the better performer and you will stand a better change of pulling out the tough signal with the R75. You can also add filters later to enhance perfromance depending on your listening tasts. Greg "funkbastler" wrote in message ... It's time for a new receiver, and can't decide between the FRG100B and R75. Right now, aesham.com has both (including the DSP unit for the R75) for the same price. I've looked at online reviews and comparisons.... some folks like one, some folks like the other, and I'm stumped. Also live a couple of hundred miles from nowhere, so going to a dealer to listen to them is not a possibility. Any guidance? -fb- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
funkbastler wrote in
: I have both. It's nearly a tie. I got both of my units from AES, the R-75 is the recent addition, and it came with the free DSP. I know that you'll get posts extolling the superiority of the R-75, but seriously, it isn't superior. As I learn the R-75, the operation becomes easier. At first, I had as much trouble with it as I did with the FRG-100. Though the keypad makes frequency entry easier, the older analog sets didn't have a keypad, and people actually survived. I find myself using the TS (Tune Speed?) setting on the R-75 anyway, and tuning it as I would the FRG-100. When you use the dial, just as when you use your computer to browse the internet, you tend to find other interesting frequencies on the way to your target frequency. If you had the exact URLs for every page on the internet, rather than finding desired sites through a search engine, you'd miss most of the fun. Arguably, if you don't have the keypad, you can't tune with it, and it sounds like a major shortcoming, but it's really not. Even though the R-75 has more trinkets, variable display light with several settings, (FRG-100 has bright and dim), the squelch control can be converted into a RF gain control easily in the set-up, it has a pre- amp 1 and 2, selectable antenna inputs (front panel select antenna 1 or 2), and the dual Pass Band Tuning, I get similar performance with my Yaesu FRG-100B. If I had to part with one of them, I get rid of the Icom R-75, but more so because I'm addicted to Yaesu radios than because of lack of performance on the R-75s part. Of the two radios, my R-75 has the free DSP, which I installed with some frustration, and my Yaesu FRG-100B has a (wide) AM filter that I bought with it and easily installed myself. I believe it was the 6 KHz filter, but it seems to come with the radio now. http://www.aesham.com/display_pages/frg100b.shtml http://www.aesham.com/display_pages/r75.shtml I'm sure you'll love either one. Have fun. Regards It's time for a new receiver, and can't decide between the FRG100B and R75. Right now, aesham.com has both (including the DSP unit for the R75) for the same price. I've looked at online reviews and comparisons.... some folks like one, some folks like the other, and I'm stumped. Also live a couple of hundred miles from nowhere, so going to a dealer to listen to them is not a possibility. Any guidance? -fb- -- Never say never. Nothing is absolute. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"grenner" wrote in
: Boy, I knew the old superiority of the sync detector issue was coming. Radio Netheralnds, of the R-75, has this to say: http://www.rnw.nl/realradio/icr75.html "What is the singular failing of this receiver? In our opinion, there is virtually no difference between synchronous AM and AM reception. The synchronous mode includes both sidebands; there is no option to choose the lower or upper sideband. The Lowe HF-150 synchronous modes and performance are far superior. We urge that ICOM correct the synchronous performance in future models and make available a retrofit ROM available to current customers. Fortunately all is not lost here. As the receiver's SSB reception is quite good, in difficult or crowded band conditions, we simply tune in the appropriate sideband of the desired signal and, if necessary, adjust the PBT controls." Of the second paragraph, the same applies to the FRG-100B. Regards R75 with DSP. You get sync and the DSP plus a keypad. The Frog has no keypad. Having had both not being a fan of either the R75 is the better performer and you will stand a better change of pulling out the tough signal with the R75. You can also add filters later to enhance perfromance depending on your listening tasts. Greg "funkbastler" wrote in message ... -- Never say never. Nothing is absolute. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've also got both of them, and I do favor the FRG100. The R75 is a very
good receiver, and it does use better circuit boards (FR4, glass epoxy), but I like the style of the FRG100 a little better. Using a good signal generator (Boonton 103D), the sensitivity is about the same on both of them. My only objection to the R75 is that "large front mounted speaker". It would be ok to have that size speaker in a manpack transceiver, but in a tabletop radio? I just don't think so! I did pick up a Drake SW8 at the last hamfest, and it also seems to be a good unit. Another unit to consider is the Palstar R30. While the R30 is what I would refer to as a "barebones" no frill type of receiver, it does have the best sounding audio out of these receivers. If I were to rate the receivers in terms of audio, I would rate them in this order: #1) Palstar R30, #2) Drake SW8, #3) Yaesu FRG100, and #4 Icom R75. In terms of sensitivity, I would rate them in this order #1) FRG100, #2) Icom R75, #3) Palstar R30, and #4) Drake SW8. In terms of sensitivity, we are really splitting hairs here, but the audio quality is a different story. I would say, go with the one that you feel the most comfortable with. Pete Soliloquy wrote in message 4... funkbastler wrote in : I have both. It's nearly a tie. I got both of my units from AES, the R-75 is the recent addition, and it came with the free DSP. I know that you'll get posts extolling the superiority of the R-75, but seriously, it isn't superior. As I learn the R-75, the operation becomes easier. At first, I had as much trouble with it as I did with the FRG-100. Though the keypad makes frequency entry easier, the older analog sets didn't have a keypad, and people actually survived. I find myself using the TS (Tune Speed?) setting on the R-75 anyway, and tuning it as I would the FRG-100. When you use the dial, just as when you use your computer to browse the internet, you tend to find other interesting frequencies on the way to your target frequency. If you had the exact URLs for every page on the internet, rather than finding desired sites through a search engine, you'd miss most of the fun. Arguably, if you don't have the keypad, you can't tune with it, and it sounds like a major shortcoming, but it's really not. Even though the R-75 has more trinkets, variable display light with several settings, (FRG-100 has bright and dim), the squelch control can be converted into a RF gain control easily in the set-up, it has a pre- amp 1 and 2, selectable antenna inputs (front panel select antenna 1 or 2), and the dual Pass Band Tuning, I get similar performance with my Yaesu FRG-100B. If I had to part with one of them, I get rid of the Icom R-75, but more so because I'm addicted to Yaesu radios than because of lack of performance on the R-75s part. Of the two radios, my R-75 has the free DSP, which I installed with some frustration, and my Yaesu FRG-100B has a (wide) AM filter that I bought with it and easily installed myself. I believe it was the 6 KHz filter, but it seems to come with the radio now. http://www.aesham.com/display_pages/frg100b.shtml http://www.aesham.com/display_pages/r75.shtml I'm sure you'll love either one. Have fun. Regards It's time for a new receiver, and can't decide between the FRG100B and R75. Right now, aesham.com has both (including the DSP unit for the R75) for the same price. I've looked at online reviews and comparisons.... some folks like one, some folks like the other, and I'm stumped. Also live a couple of hundred miles from nowhere, so going to a dealer to listen to them is not a possibility. Any guidance? -fb- -- Never say never. Nothing is absolute. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
funkbastler, if you prefer local radio announcers whilst watching sports on
television, you'll find the R-75 does a better job neutralizing heterodyne buzz than that Century Frog. R-75s need audio-n-sync cap mods to maximize their performance(even with cap mods, sync performance is better on m.w. than s.w.). And, with certain i.f. configurations, the R-75's pass band tuning is nixed, unlike the Century Frog(via i.f. shift capibility). Those extra 50 presets on the R-75 come in handy, though. F.M. reception is included on the R-75, whereas it's an extra $50 add-on with the Century Frog. Whichever receiver you choose, you'll find exemplary performance. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() elg110254 wrote: funkbastler, if you prefer local radio announcers whilst watching sports on television, you'll find the R-75 does a better job neutralizing heterodyne buzz than that Century Frog. R-75s need audio-n-sync cap mods to maximize their performance(even with cap mods, sync performance is better on m.w. than s.w.). And, with certain i.f. configurations, the R-75's pass band tuning is nixed, unlike the Century Frog(via i.f. shift capibility). Those extra 50 presets on the R-75 come in handy, though. F.M. reception is included on the R-75, whereas it's an extra $50 add-on with the Century Frog. Whichever receiver you choose, you'll find exemplary performance. Just a quick addemndum to lq's fine post: The R-75 does indeed include FM capability, but it does not cover the FM *broadcast* band of 88-108mHz. Tony ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
R75 without DSP!
Maurizio |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Maurizio Bonfanti" wrote in news:S0ajb.39620
: You're Italian all right. The R-75 comes with a free DSP, are you suggesting that he emphatically refuses it, perhaps giving it to a DSP starved child in Africa? What about getting the FREE DSP, but then not using it, or using it selectively? Regards. (I still like the FRG-100 better) R75 without DSP! Maurizio -- Never say never. Nothing is absolute. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks everyone.
Have ordered the R75 - and to keep Maurizio happy, I'll try not to use the DSP very much ;-) -fb- |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Icom R75 Receiver w/DSP | Equipment | |||
FS: Icom R75 Receiver w/DSP | Equipment | |||
FS: Icom R75 Receiver w/DSP | Equipment | |||
FS: Icom R75 Receiver w/DSP | Equipment | |||
FS: Icom R75 Receiver w/DSP | Shortwave |