Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think these are going up in value. I should have bought one when they were
under $1000. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...88627 41&rd=1 -- 73 and good DXing. Brian ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A lot of radios and 100' of rusty wire! Zumbrota, Southern MN Brian's Radio Universe http://webpages.charter.net/brianhill/ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Brian Hill" wrote in message ...
I think these are going up in value. I should have bought one when they were under $1000. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...88627 41&rd=1 I've also noticed that the ebay price of the Sony ICF-SW77 has increased considerably since this model was discontinued. One in very good condition sold yesterday for just a little over $450. Steve |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Brian Hill wrote: I think these are going up in value. I should have bought one when they were under $1000. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...88627 41&rd=1 I can never figure out why the R7A's go for so much when the R7 sells for much less. They are the same radio! The ONLY difference was that in the R7A some accessory's came as standard. I'll be keeping my R7. dxAce Michigan USA |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() BDK wrote: In article , says... Brian Hill wrote: I think these are going up in value. I should have bought one when they were under $1000. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...88627 41&rd=1 I can never figure out why the R7A's go for so much when the R7 sells for much less. They are the same radio! The ONLY difference was that in the R7A some accessory's came as standard. I'll be keeping my R7. dxAce Michigan USA Wasn't the R7A supposed to be more stable?? I thought that was the main difference. My friend's R7 took a long time to settle down when first turned on... Not that I've ever heard. The only real difference was the fact that the R7A came with the NB7A noise blanker as standard, along with the 500 khz filter, and there was a wire jumper across the filter board giving '9 kHz' selectivity. If there was any slight stability enhancement it would have been minor, and easily retro-fitted. I've never seen anything pertaining to that. Yes, they do drift a bit up to warm-up... but that is what a tuning knob is for! Listening to BBC 15190 at the moment on my R7 with 8 kHz filter in place. dxAce Michigan USA |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() dxAce wrote: BDK wrote: In article , says... Brian Hill wrote: I think these are going up in value. I should have bought one when they were under $1000. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...88627 41&rd=1 I can never figure out why the R7A's go for so much when the R7 sells for much less. They are the same radio! The ONLY difference was that in the R7A some accessory's came as standard. I'll be keeping my R7. dxAce Michigan USA Wasn't the R7A supposed to be more stable?? I thought that was the main difference. My friend's R7 took a long time to settle down when first turned on... Not that I've ever heard. The only real difference was the fact that the R7A came with the NB7A noise blanker as standard, along with the 500 khz filter, and there was a wire jumper across the filter board giving '9 kHz' selectivity. If there was any slight stability enhancement it would have been minor, and easily retro-fitted. I've never seen anything pertaining to that. Yes, they do drift a bit up to warm-up... but that is what a tuning knob is for! I've taken to running my R7 from a seperate 12 volt supply, which cuts down on internal heating, by the way. Listening to BBC 15190 at the moment on my R7 with 8 kHz filter in place. dxAce Michigan USA |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dxAce" wrote in message I can never figure out why the R7A's go for so much when the R7 sells for much less. They are the same radio! The ONLY difference was that in the R7A some accessory's came as standard. I'll be keeping my R7. dxAce Michigan USA Hum? I didn't know that. Ive always looked at them all as R-7s. I like the R-7s and have always wanted one. They always struck me as a serious looking peice of equipment. If I could find one for $600-800 I would probably buy it. -- 73 and good DXing. Brian ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A lot of radios and 100' of rusty wire! Zumbrota, Southern MN Brian's Radio Universe http://webpages.charter.net/brianhill/ |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
I think these are going up in value. I should have bought one when they were under $1000. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...&item=57288627 41&rd=1 I'm not suggesting that the seller is trying to pull a fast one, but he should have tuned the radio to 28.888.8 mhz so we could at least see that all the LED segments are working. The R7(A) is indeed a fantastic radio. I have one. Yes, it drifts a bit, but unless you're into RTTY or something, who cares? I love the analog tuning with digital readout. It's the best of both worlds. And it's a real head-turner, a beautiful looking rig. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA Lots of Nice Drake Gear | Equipment | |||
FA Lots of Nice Drake Gear | Equipment | |||
FA Lots of Nice Drake Gear | Equipment | |||
FA Lots of Nice Drake Gear | Boatanchors | |||
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade | Homebrew |