Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 16th 05, 09:06 PM
Michael R. Davis
 
Posts: n/a
Default Antenna Aperature

I'm reading an article about antenna aperature. Is it correct to state
that dipoles have a very large aperature and something like a horn
assembly used in microwaves has a tiny aperature except for wavelength
for which the horn is designed?

Just trying to get a handle on this advanced theory.
  #2   Report Post  
Old July 16th 05, 10:20 PM
Frank
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Michael R. Davis" wrote in message
...
I'm reading an article about antenna aperature. Is it correct to state
that dipoles have a very large aperature and something like a horn
assembly used in microwaves has a tiny aperature except for wavelength for
which the horn is designed?

Just trying to get a handle on this advanced theory.


Dipole aperture is the capture area which translates an incident field, in
W/m^2, to the actual power received by the dipole. For example the aperture
for a half wave dipole is 0.13(Lambda)^2, where Lambda is the wavelength in
meters. A 40 m half wave dipole would therefore have an aperture of 52
m^2. A horn aperture, and also a parabolic dish, aperture is the physical
area of the mouth of the horn.

Regards.

Frank


  #3   Report Post  
Old July 17th 05, 03:34 AM
Michael R. Davis
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Frank wrote:


Dipole aperture is the capture area which translates an incident field, in
W/m^2, to the actual power received by the dipole. For example the aperture
for a half wave dipole is 0.13(Lambda)^2, where Lambda is the wavelength in
meters. A 40 m half wave dipole would therefore have an aperture of 52
m^2. A horn aperture, and also a parabolic dish, aperture is the physical
area of the mouth of the horn.

Regards.

Frank



Well, I sure read _that_ wrong! Thanks for clearing that up.

  #4   Report Post  
Old July 17th 05, 10:01 AM
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It's not advanced at all. If both antennas are equally efficient, the
ratio of their apertures (in square wavelengths) is exactly equal to the
gain of one relative to the other.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

Michael R. Davis wrote:
I'm reading an article about antenna aperature. Is it correct to state
that dipoles have a very large aperature and something like a horn
assembly used in microwaves has a tiny aperature except for wavelength
for which the horn is designed?

Just trying to get a handle on this advanced theory.

  #5   Report Post  
Old July 17th 05, 02:24 PM
JS
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Michael R. Davis wrote:
I'm reading an article about antenna aperature. Is it correct to state
that dipoles have a very large aperature and something like a horn
assembly used in microwaves has a tiny aperature except for wavelength
for which the horn is designed?

Just trying to get a handle on this advanced theory.


Hi Mike:

You didn't state what you were reading specifically but this free
on-line book seems to be well researched and read.

http://www.qsl.net/n1bwt/contents.htm

73,

John - WD1V
FN-42
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Imax ground plane question Vinnie S. CB 151 April 15th 05 05:21 AM
Discone antenna plans [email protected] Antenna 13 January 14th 05 11:51 PM
Yaesu FT-857D questions Joe S. Equipment 6 October 25th 04 09:40 AM
LongWire Antenna Jim B Shortwave 5 March 2nd 04 09:36 AM
EH Antenna Revisited Walter Maxwell Antenna 47 January 16th 04 04:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017