Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 18th 05, 03:50 PM
I Love LA
 
Posts: n/a
Default How dense can they all be?

On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:55:58 +0900, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:

I keep hearing on the news about the massive failure in communications after
Katrina (and they're also talking about the same thing after 9/11).

My question is... are these people completely clueless? Don't they have
engineers that they can talk to?

In the case of 9/11, where were the repeaters for the fire/police/etc? On
top of the WTC towers... and those lost power when the planes hit (at least
the upper floors), ergo, no comms. And they certainly weren't working after
the towers fell.

Now, I may be in error about the location of their repeaters, these may have
been elsewhere (the only other real choice would be the Empire State
Building), but again, walkie talkies don't work well inside of concrete
buildings.. range would be spotty at best.

They're talking about needing more spectrum for comms. Under those
conditions, no amount of additional spectrum space would make a whit of
difference.

This goes double or more for New Orleans. They could have all the spectrum
space in the world, but if the infrastructure to run it (electrical power,
antenna systems, etc.) is destroyed, it would avail them not at all. One of
the problems with UHF and VHF two way communications is that the antennas
need to be as high as possible, which makes them prime targets for hurricane
force winds. There are locat tactical frequencies that allow on scene
personnel to talk to one another, but those are very limited in range, and
furthermore the chargers for those handie talkies are sitting back at the
station which has no power, or limited time on generator power. Maybe
satellite coms are the answer, get away from terrestrial linkups that are
more fallible. And you can stuff a lot of PS comms on a single 72MHz wide Ku
band transponder.

So much for my little rant.. I just can't believe they're griping about the
government not doing enough to insure comms during an emergency, when in
some emergencies, such as a hurricane, tornado, or terrorist bombing, the
comms infrastructure may be the first thing to go, and there's not a hell of
a lot you can do about it.


Would you PLEASE stop confusing the issue with the facts!!!!!
Everyone knows it's Bush's fault.
  #2   Report Post  
Old September 18th 05, 06:59 PM
ai8o
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"I Love LA" wrote in message
...

I keep hearing on the news about the massive failure in communications
after
Katrina (and they're also talking about the same thing after 9/11).


My question is... are these people completely clueless?

YES~they are completely clueless.
They technological illiterates.
( for example: Just look at the lack of technical experience of former FCC
commisioner Powell and current commisioner Abernathy.)

Don't they have engineers that they can talk to?


major snip

There are engineers, and other comms folks that they can talk to.
Unfortunately, the higher command political types DON"T talk to them.
They view commo types as techno-GEEKS and idiots because comm folks don't
schmooze or BS and don't have political skills.

The eyes of higher command political types glaze over, and their minds go
blank, when you start to talking about mission critical components, fault
tolerance, system robustness,and critical path analysis.

Comms structures tend to be up high and outside in areas that are cheap to
acquire.
Cheap usually boils down to areas that nobody else wants.
Consequently Mission Critical Towers, antennas, radio transmitters, and
relay equipment tends to be put in areas that are the first to be damaged in
severe weather and are hard to access even under good conditions.

Cheap also means that a of maintenace is "deferred", and a full set of
back-up or even critical repair parts and equipment is not acquired, much
less stored and assembled in a ready to go condition.



They're talking about needing more spectrum for comms. Under those
conditions, no amount of additional spectrum space would make a whit of
difference.


Communications spectrum is really not the problem.
Lack of Bandwidth on the few remaining operational comm systems is the real
problem.
In an emergency there is a greatly increased amount of data trying to go
through the few, much reduced, remaining comm systems

So much for my little rant.. I just can't believe they're griping about
the
government not doing enough to insure comms during an emergency, when in
some emergencies, such as a hurricane, tornado, or terrorist bombing, the
comms infrastructure may be the first thing to go, and there's not a hell
of
a lot you can do about it.


THAT"S RIGHT, but you can have equipment stockpiled and trained
installers/operators ready to go.



  #3   Report Post  
Old September 19th 05, 07:44 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:55:58 +0900, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:

I keep hearing on the news about the massive failure in communications after
Katrina (and they're also talking about the same thing after 9/11).

My question is... are these people completely clueless? Don't they have
engineers that they can talk to?

In the case of 9/11, where were the repeaters for the fire/police/etc? On
top of the WTC towers... and those lost power when the planes hit (at least
the upper floors), ergo, no comms. And they certainly weren't working after
the towers fell.

Now, I may be in error about the location of their repeaters, these may have
been elsewhere (the only other real choice would be the Empire State
Building), but again, walkie talkies don't work well inside of concrete
buildings.. range would be spotty at best.

They're talking about needing more spectrum for comms. Under those
conditions, no amount of additional spectrum space would make a whit of
difference.

This goes double or more for New Orleans. They could have all the spectrum
space in the world, but if the infrastructure to run it (electrical power,
antenna systems, etc.) is destroyed, it would avail them not at all. One of
the problems with UHF and VHF two way communications is that the antennas
need to be as high as possible, which makes them prime targets for hurricane
force winds. There are locat tactical frequencies that allow on scene
personnel to talk to one another, but those are very limited in range, and
furthermore the chargers for those handie talkies are sitting back at the
station which has no power, or limited time on generator power. Maybe
satellite coms are the answer, get away from terrestrial linkups that are
more fallible. And you can stuff a lot of PS comms on a single 72MHz wide Ku
band transponder.


You still have the problem of the hand units which can't be
charged.


So much for my little rant.. I just can't believe they're griping about the
government not doing enough to insure comms during an emergency, when in
some emergencies, such as a hurricane, tornado, or terrorist bombing, the
comms infrastructure may be the first thing to go, and there's not a hell of
a lot you can do about it.



  #4   Report Post  
Old September 19th 05, 08:55 AM
RHF
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cuhulin - But 'you' Claim that you are a Genius
and therefore next to 'you' Karl Rove
is simply a mere mortal.
  #5   Report Post  
Old September 19th 05, 02:13 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

But I am a Genius,,, well,Super Intelligent anyway.Just because I worked
at a factory that manufactured aluminum extrusions and anodized the
aluminum extrusions and assembled the aluminum extrusions into finished
products does not make me an aluminum expert.I also worked for a company
here in Jackson that manufactured wooden floor model tv cabinets for
companies such as Zenith and others and a factory in
Florence,Mississippi that manufactured auto/truck/lawnmower
batteries,but that doesn't make make me an expert Genius on those
products and I drove a bread truck for Sunbeam Bakery doesn't make me an
expert Genius on bread and cakes and I handled Ammunition in Vietnam,I
went to Armor Ordnance School at Fort Knox,Kentucky and that doesn't
make me an expet Genius on Ammunition although I did learn something
about handling and supplying the Ammunition we supplied and ARADCOM at
Scott Air Force Base,Illinois and SL-60 near Pacific,Missouri and 22nd
Chemical Company at Fort Hood,Texas doesn't make me an expert Genius on
those thingys.karl rove is just another crooked politician.
cuhulin



  #6   Report Post  
Old September 19th 05, 04:43 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

bush Questions Reopening of New Orleans. www.drudgereport.com AWOL
MORON CHIMPMONKEY bush has NO!!! Right to Question anything at ALL!
cuhulin

  #7   Report Post  
Old September 19th 05, 07:33 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yeah,RHF,I am a Genius. www.rense.com 911 Lies Under Fire - Truth
Finally Emregin.

I am the smartest son of a bitch Genius on Earth!
cuhulin

  #8   Report Post  
Old September 20th 05, 05:09 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have a brand new pair of roller skates,, she has the brand new
keyyyyyyy,,,,,, I got the Hoss and she got the Saddle,,,,, together we
are going to rideeeee,,,, rideeee,,,,,,, rideeeee,,,,, together we are
goin to rideeeee,, rideeeee,,,,, in the Moonlight,,,,,, in the
Moonlightttttt,,,,,,,,,
Somewhere West of Laramie.Look it up at, www.devilfinder.com
(Screw y'alls google!!!!!!)
cuhulin

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How dense can they all be? David Shortwave 30 September 25th 05 05:49 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017