In article , Alun
writes:
However, ham radio is not a job or a vocation, just a hobby.
For many hams that's true.
But does that mean there should be no standards or requirements to join?
I welcome the
unmotivated as much as I would welcome anyone else. Why shouldn't they
have fun too?
OK, fine.
What do you think of this idea, Alun:
Require all new hams to pass the Extra written in 10 years or less or they get
tossed off the amateur bands.
Is that a good idea or a bad idea?
If someone wants HF and doesn't want to learn code, why
should they bother to study for a VHF and above licence, when they could
be scuba diving or building model railroads or what have you? (Not hobbies
of mine, personally, but whatever turns you on). I know this is sacrilege
to true beleivers, but so what?
OK, fine.
If someone wants to operate radios rather than build them, why must they learn
a lot of theory stuff that they are not interested in? To suit someone else's
idea of what amateur radio should be?
Why is a Technician Plus class licensee qualified to do anything allowed by the
rules on 2 meters, but not on 20 meters? What special knowledge is imparted by
the General and Extra class written tests?
The notion that only hams should decide the future of ham radio is just
that, a notion. I can absolutely guarantee that it is not a point of view
shared by the FCC, and it makes little sense to me either. At the very
least all prospective hams have a vested interest, irregardless of the
reasons they don't have a licence, reasonable or otherwise. I'm sure the
FCC would cast their net a lot wider than that.
Actually the FCC won't cast their net at all. They don't do polls or surveys -
just comments, petitions and proposals.
How many comments did the last restructuring get - 2500? Almost all of them
were from already-licensed hams. Less than 1/2 of 1%, too.
73 de Jim, N2EY
|