View Single Post
  #174   Report Post  
Old November 29th 03, 05:54 PM
Dee D. Flint
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
link.net...

"Dee D. Flint" wrote:

Morse code is uniquely necessary. (snip)



Saying so doesn't make it true, Dee. Within the goals and purposes of

the
Amateur Radio Service, and to justify a unique testing requirement, how is
Morse code uniquely necessary today? Do remember recreational use is not
sufficient enough to justify a unique testing requirement (recreational

use
is equally applicable to all modes and they don't have a unique testing
requirement).


Well Dwight saying it isn't doesn't make that true either Dwight. I speak
from personal experience. How much HF experience have you had? How much
weak signal VHF experience have you had? Again keep in mind that I have
said Morse is necessary. While I happen to believe that testing should be
maintained that is NOT the point I am debating at this time and you keep
trying to drag it back to testing. I am stating that Morse code itself is
necessary.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE