"KØHB" wrote:
(snip) ...by their license grant they are
responsible for a ensuring that their
transmitted signal meets a set of technical
parameters beyond what the little blinky
digits on the faceplate read.
The current qualification process is
woefully inadequate to ensure they can
fulfill that responsibility. (snip)
Yet there are no widespread problems, reported by the FCC or other
organizations, relating to that. How can that be, Hans? Perhaps you're wrong
about your assessment of a large portion of this radio community.
The current rules have kept most... (snip)
...in parts of the spectrum which have
mostly local propagation, even with 1.5KW
output.
Out of band emissions, and so on, are not dependant on HF, Hans. Again, no
widespread problems relating to that.
However, we can soon expect rules changes
which may extend their turf to parts of the
spectrum where their ignorance can have
worldwide visibility and consequences. And
that scares the bejeebers out of me.
Yet that very thing is happening in many countries around the world, with
none yet reporting any problems whatsoever. Or is it just American operators
(their "ignorance") that scares the "bejeebers" out of you?
Dwight Stewart (W5NET)
http://www.qsl.net/w5net/