Dwight Stewart wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote:

Regardless of the reasoning, do you
concur with altering peoples posts
to reflect your own wishes?



Of course not. But do you concur with attempts to alter the perception of
a person's status as a Ham by blatantly omitting that person's callsign in a
list containing only the callsigns of others? Jim is aware of what he's
doing. Kim had already asked him to include her callsign (a request which
should have been unnecessary).

If Kim is uncomfortable with Kim's callsign, that is within his rights.
Standard email would have left no doubts about the message. Message
quoted, and "this" should be changed.

I don't know about everyone's mailreaders, but on the ones I used, it
takes an extra effort to reply to a message and take the quotes out.

I noticed it immediately. What is the point of doing it otherwise?

- Mike KB3EIA -