"Dave Heil" wrote:

You really think in that way? Do
you think I'd approve if Kim had
chosen a vulgar name for a male
body part to use as the suffix of
her call?


Luckily, we have fewer "vulgar" body parts to worry about. Men have
chests too, but that somehow escaped being vulgar. As my wife would say,
perhaps because men mostly decided what is vulgar over the years. As a
result, chests with protrusions are vulgar (with special little names like
"tits"), while those without protrusions are not.


Excellent dodge of the statement,
Dwight. You might have a future
in politics.


No, I'm a little too opinionated for that.


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/