In article , Mike Coslo writes:
The present system is not "broken" It doesn't need fixed. It is what it
is, and is just one of those things that grew up over the years.
I think it needs a bit of tweaking, but not a fullscale makeover as some seem
to think.
When
Morse code was ascendant, there was a need for multiple license classes,
since Morse is one of those skills that takes time to hone, and it made
sense then to have a rank beginner level, and work up from there.
I'm not sure what you mean by "Morse code was ascendant" - can you explain a
bit more?
I would say that *any* knowledge or skill requires time to develop, whether
it's theory knowledge,
practical radio knowhow or Morse skills. Thus, there will still be a need for
several license classes.
I think there should be more levels than three, but FCC's action in 1999 makes
it clear that's
probably a lost cause. So three classes it is:
One that's easy to get so that people can get started without having to learn
everything in one go
One that gives full privileges and requires some serious knowledge
One intermediate step so that it's not a huge jump.
This is the system we have however, and we tinker with it at our own
peril. We do not want to remove privileges, nor do we want to increase
privileges without any testing. The reduction issue seems to have been
proven by the Incentive licensing problem in the 60's, and giving away
free upgrades will only serve to anger people in the other direction.
I agree 100%! Indeed, there is still criticism of the IL plan 36 years after it
was put
in place, and in many places from people who did not become hams until long
after
it was in effect!
It is a foolish system that angers people on purpose. You don't anger
those who are your friends, you anger your enemies.
Better yet, you render your enemies ineffective. But most of all you don't
anger your
friends unnecessarily.
To have a Morse code test for entry into HF is not going to happen, and
to have a Morse code test for Amateur Extra doesn't make sense, given
that the Extra is the highest level license, and Morse code was at one
time required for the lowest level, Novice. There is a big disconnect there.
I disagree!
Given the popularity of Morse code in amateur radio, it makes no sense to not
have it be
a part of the testing for a license. Imagine if there were no questions on SSB
in the tests -
would that make sense?
The Morse Code test has been portrayed as the boogieman, as if it is the source
of all
of amateur radio's problems. Yet there is no proof of these claims.
I therefore propose a system that is quite like what we have now.
Technician, General, and Amateur Extra. Privileges the same.
This means all Techs have VHF/UHF only?
The two orphan classes, Tech plus and Advanced, will remain where they
are, with privileges staying the same.
What about Novice?
After the changeover, the new testing regimen will be:
Technician: heavy on RF safety, Light on electronics theory. Some
questions related to the VHF and UHF where the tech's will largely
operate The technician is considered a preparatory license, and will
give a good base of how to get on the air without frying yourself in the
process.
Perhaps, but what that does is to funnel newcomers into VHF/UHF rather than HF.
And
since VHF/UHF gear tends to be harder to homebrew and more complex than HF
equipment,
it tends to funnel newcomers to manufactured equipment. Also, since there is
relatively little
use of Morse Code for casual operating on VHF/UHF, it tends to funnel newcomers
to FM
voice operation.
General: General test will scale back on the RF safety, and replace it
with more theory. Antenna questions and operating procedures. The never
entertaining band edge questions will get a few more questions.
Needs to have some serious HF centric stuff, though.
Extra: more in depth treatment of theory. No band edge or safety
questions, at this point, if you don't know safety, you've already fried
your mind. questions demonstrating knowledge of different modes.
The only controversial part of my proposal is that there would be a 2
year wait between General and Extra. I could be persuaded to drop that
pretty easily!
I'd say the experience requirements should be included.
Bands and sub bands:
At this point, the bands will remain the same. Bandplan adjustments
will be made. Novice sections will remain, and will be considered a
"practice ground" for those who want to learn Morse code. note: this may
actually be a way to kick start Morse code use.
I don't see the need for that. Better to open up some of the lower part of the
bands for newcomers to use Morse.
The natural tendency is for Morse to be at the bottom of the band, data in the
middle, and 'phone at the top. Rather than fight that trend, the newcomer
segments should reinforce it.
The Novice subbands were originally put in the middle of their bands in a
misguided effort to keep them from straying outside the band edges. Since
Novices were originally required to use crystal control, this made little sense
even in 1951.
So there you have it. Here is a plan that shouldn't p**s anyone off
that isn't *already* mad about something, and as far as I can see, it's
major disadvantage is that it isn't glamorous or exciting.
Is it the "ideal" plan?* Heck no! But it accomplishes moving past the
Morse code issue with a minimum of disruption, and has the side benefit
that we know it will work.
Comments?
I agree that massive changes and giveaways are a bad idea.
However, I think that one of the problems today is that the entry-level license
is too VHF/UHF/voice/applicane operator-centric.
The entry level license should offer a wide selection of bands and modes,
rather than what we have now where newcomers get all of VHF/UHF but no HF.
73 de Jim, N2EY
|