Thread
:
BPL NPRM v. NOI
View Single Post
#
95
March 26th 04, 06:44 PM
N2EY
Posts: n/a
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , Robert Casey
writes:
N2EY wrote:
In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:
It's generally agreed that Access BPL will be a bad thing in any urban
radio environment.
Generally agreed by whom?
The BPL developers don't agree. And they're professionals.
Sure, they were by investors told to build something that could get
digital information over
power cables. The fact that it will radiate was not an issue for them.
But a big
issue for us.
The FCC doesn't agree. They're professionals too, and regulators of all
"civilian" radio and wire communications in the USA.
Bullshjt, they're just brearucrats who are lawyers and not engineers.
They're "professionals, though. Just like Len!
They probably
figure that they can sue whatever out of existance to solve problems....
The FCC also created the six-tiered amateur license structure
prior to R&O 99-412 and established 13 and 20 WPM morse
code rates. :-)
Yep, back when the agency was run by technically knowledgeable people
who would have laughed BPL right out the door.
Six classes of license dates back to 1951.
13 wpm code test dates back to 1936
20 wpm code test dates back to the early 1920s
Tell us, Len - how do we *amateurs* fight something the
*professionals* say is a good thing? How do we convicne them it *is* a
"major calamity"?
Or don't you know how to do that?
Reply With Quote
