Subject: BPL NPRM v. NOI
From: (N2EY)
Date: 3/26/2004 11:44 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article , Robert Casey
writes:
N2EY wrote:
In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes:
Bullshjt, they're just brearucrats who are lawyers and not engineers.
They're "professionals, though. Just like Len!
I consider myself a "professional" too, but I don't remember ahving been
taught that profanity is an effective means of communication.
Must be a night-school engineer's course.
They probably
figure that they can sue whatever out of existance to solve problems....
The FCC also created the six-tiered amateur license structure
prior to R&O 99-412 and established 13 and 20 WPM morse
code rates. :-)
Yep, back when the agency was run by technically knowledgeable people
who would have laughed BPL right out the door.
Those days left with Jimmy Carter's administration.
Six classes of license dates back to 1951.
13 wpm code test dates back to 1936
20 wpm code test dates back to the early 1920s
Tell us, Len - how do we *amateurs* fight something the
*professionals* say is a good thing? How do we convicne them it *is* a
"major calamity"?
Or don't you know how to do that?
Sure...you bombard newsgroups for which you have no vested interest with
years of aggitation, argument and profanity.
Steve, K4YZ