March 28th 04, 04:07 PM
|
|
|
Subject: BPL NPRM v. NOI
From: (Len Over 21)
Date: 3/27/2004 3:18 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
In article , PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:
You've waved your "professional" credentials here innumerable times, but you
can't tell us how to convince FCC of something that's blaringly obvious to
even us poor dumb amateurs.
I'm sorry to hear you have such a low self-image.
You can't bolster that low self-image by attempting to force others
into answering your questions...those usually a set-up for an
expected reply...
But, on the thread SUBJECT...the FCC cannot directly stop Access
BPL. It doesn't have the direct legal authority to do so. All the FCC
can do right now is to set standards on the levels of incidental RF
radiation from an Access BPL system. That is what NPRM 04-29
is all about.
Sure it can.
The second a complaint is filed by an FCC licensee they ahve the authority
to stop it.
So far, literally thousands of amateurs have complained bitterly
about Access BPL to the FCC on proceedings 03-104, 04-37,
and 04-29. They've demanded that the FCC "stop" it. The FCC
cannot "stop" it. All the FCC can do is set standards for incidental
RF radiation from Access BPL systems. Very, very few, if any,
amateurs have suggested ANY levels of such RF radiation limits
other than zero as in stopping Access BPL entirely.
Sure they can "stop it".
Steve, K4YZ
|