Carl R. Stevenson wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
news

Carl R. Stevenson wrote:

"Mike Coslo" wrote in message

I support a system that is basically like what we have now. Only
difference is that Morse code is not tested for AT ALL. I would think
NCI would prefer a system like that instead of one in which there is
still a test for Extra.


The one part of the ARRL proposal that NCI opposes is the "keep the

Morse

test for Extra" part.

Do you think my proposal is BS?

- Mike KB3EIA -


You are free to have your own views/proposals. I didn't say they were BS
... I was ONLY talking about the assertion that NCI was "supporting a
reduction in written test requirements" and your "spin" comments.

But do you think my proposal will work? We have a number of years of
operation under such a system, and I have not heard of any problems with
the database administration of the orphan licensees.

- Mike KB3EIA -