"Alun" wrote in message
...
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in
ink.net:


"Alun" wrote in message
...
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in
nk.net:


"Alun" wrote in message
...

Look up what class of licence I have and when it was issued

And how am I to do that Alun? You have not seen fit to provide a
callsign. And I am not going to play detective.

Dan/W4NTI




I've posted my call from time to time. It's N3KIP. I was issued a
no-code UK licence in 1980 (callsign G8VUK, and you will find I've
posted that too), a US one in 1992, and then an Advanced and an Extra
by 1993, which was multiple guess 20wpm. I suppose it depends what you
mean by knowing CW? Certainly I don't know it at 35wpm and neither do
I have any practical experience of it, but the entire point is that I
didn't _want_ to learn it or use it.

Sorry Alun....hadn't gotten this far down the list before I sent my
latest to you.

I'll correct things a bit. You didn't earn a extra with that test
either. It was just a bit less of a give away then the 5wpm joke now.

You still know nothing about cw.

Why do you continue to argue the point? It is obvious I am right.

Dan/W4NTI




The point is that I don't need to know anything about CW to respond to the
statement "phone operators are lids". What does that have to do with CW?

You introduced the question of whether I know anything about CW, and I
answered it, but it proves nothing.

It has nothing to do with it. I just get tired of people that put on like
they know something and don't. So lets just agree to disagree. What dif
does it make anyway?

Dan/W4NTI