View Single Post
  #41   Report Post  
Old June 8th 04, 03:25 AM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(Superham, able to leap tall
pilups at a single boundary equation) writes:

(Len Over 21) wrote in message
...
In article ,

(Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes:


You are the epitome of newsgroup antagonist and troll. You laid

waste to
your own name and "character" a long time ago. You are a documented liar

and
deceiver.


"Liar?" In one way, to one pair of eyes, that is true

I disrupt the fantasies and wish-fulfillment of someone with reality.


Lennie, you really DO believe the lies and rhetoric you spew
about Amateur Radio, don't you..?!?! Despite having been corrected
and redirected to countless sources of data that contradicts almost
everything you say, you still insist that your putrid lies are valid.


1. Nursie hasn't "directed" anyone...except AWAY from here.

2. Nursie hasn't given any "countless sources of data."

3. That (supposed) data does NOT "contradict" anything I've
written in here.

4. Nursie's "meaningful dialogue" consists of nothing more
that personal insults.

5. I "spew" NO "lies" about amateur radio. I give some
personal opinions on subjects...which nursie can't abide.

6. Too bad for nursie.


That can be a distinct ego blow.


There's been no blow to MY ego over anything you've "presented" in
this forum. I get aggitated that someone can so overtly lie and
attempt to mislead people without some sort of resounding recourse,
but hey, every creep eventually ahs his day...you will too.


"aggitated?" "ahs?" :-)

Tsk, tsk, tsk...when aggravated into another rage, nursie begins
confusing spellings again...:-)

"Deceiver?" In what way? Not following your imaginations and fantasies
as "truth?"


"I am going to get my "extra lite" out of the box".


Why should I do that? :-)

"I am only here to civilly debate the Morse Code test issue"


That's what I originally thought way back when...but then all
those OFs of the morse persuasion got so evil, wicked, mean
and nasty towards anyone who didn't love, honor, and cherish
telegraphy. :-)

"I'll send a scanned image of my FCC License to anyone who asks
for it"


I did that already. :-)

Reality can be harsh. Try to accept reality as it exists.


That's not my problem, Lennie...Accepting that mere mortal,
non-engineer lay persons with an FCC license can do more with a radio
than you ever THOUGHT about doing is YOURS.


Nursie is a "mere mortal?" Good grief...I thought nursie was a
Warrior of the Newsgroup, able to benchpress a KWM2,
faster than a speeding ballot, leap tall pileups at a single bound...

I'm still trying to invent antigravity...but something is holding me
down... :-)

YOU "soiled the communications enviroment" when you started in with

the
"jackbooted thugs", "elitists" and other demeaning adjectives and then

followed
it up with ream after ream of cowardly, spiteful anti-Amateur rhetoric.


Your jackboots wear out?


I'll specifically buy a pair next time I visit California, then
see just how much it takes to wear them down...How's that, Lennie?


I'll get the group down at the Burbank HRO store to notify the
newspapers that you will give them a photo opportunity. :-)

You DO know what's right next door to that HRO store, don't
you? :-)


If being a "ham" means living in a fantasy world of great derring-do in
radio, then I'm certainly not one of those deceivers.


You've never been in ANY world of radio operating, Lennie...You
have been around them, used them as a tool, maybe even played with one
on a bench, but you're incompetent when it comes to OPERATING one.


Love all nursie's "meaningful dialogue." :-)

I could recite again my experience, but nursie gets SO upset
about that! Tsk, tsk, tsk.

Actually, I began in radio by doing some operations of military
transmitters...and receivers...and FSK exciters...and teleprinters
...and handheld transceivers...and Jeep-mounted transceivers...
and manpack transceivers.

Then I got out of active duty, got the commercial First Phone
and operated broadcast transmitters and all the other electronic
stuff around a TV studio. Came out west and did some radar
and missle transmitting-receiving. Got a personal radio on CB
(for fun communications), even designed and built a couple of
CB transceiver prototypes for a company that went Chapter 11
a rather long time ago. As time went on, I did real civil airways
radio operating from a real cockpit, handled UHF two-ways,
got into a partnership which installed and used a VHF two-way,
communicated with a station ON the moon, did a bunch of
DoD and military radio field work, and eventually communicated
on HF from a moored sailboat in a marina.

That's just a quick summary of things I did since 1952. There's
other little things that will make you angry because your mighty
morphing hamradiolicense forbids you to do those. :-)

Never once since 1952 have I needed or been required to use
manual telegraphy to "work" anyone on any radio frequency
from VLF on up to 25 GHz.

Never once did I have to "QSL" anyone that "contact work" had
been done. Never once did I have to join any ARRL in order to
verify anything I did in radio-electronics. But...I've written a lot
of reports on radio performance which were all accurate and true.

Putz.


Tsk, tsk, tsk...still into cussing and personal attacks as "meaningful
discussions?" [not at all a good image of an amateur extra...]


It's not my image, Lennie. It's yours. You're the putz.


You don't have an image? Tsk, tsk, you should swear and cuss
some more then... :-)

Other readers of this newsgroup have an "image" of nursie. :-)




They ought to sue you for defamation by association.


IEEE is a professional association. I joined them late, like in
1973. By now I've become a Life Member in the IEEE with all
the benefits of regular working members after 31 years in
the electronics engineering profession.

Life Membership in the IEEE is automatic, no extra dues,
no one-time charge, nothing extra once you have so much
membership time plus age. There's about 220 thousand IEEE
members all around the world. It is truly international.

You want to suggest legal action by the IEEE against me?
The quickest way for you to contact them is to go to
www.ieee.org and get an address or send them some of
your filthymouth e-mail. IEEE has automatic virus detection
software to detect badness in e-mail...they just don't always
detect badasses in e-mail. :-)