Subject: The Game's Afoot!
From: (Len Over 21)
Date: 6/18/2004 2:48 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
In article ,
(Steve
da CAP Ace with too much carburetor heat) sputters and foams:
"I am only here to civilly debate the Morse Code test issue". From the
archived lies of Leonard H. Anderson.
That was 29 years ago, senior.
That was 13 years ago, senior.
If you're going to parody Spanish, Lennie, you should at least spell it
correctly.
The DSN (Digital Switched Network) ...(SNIP)
Even more completely unrealted, off topic trivia from one who must hide
behind it.
Try to get with the modern times. Reality is all around you.
Yes, it is.
Too bad you can't share in it, eh...?!?!
I am well acquainted with life.
Nop, you're not. You are well acquainted with your PERCEPTION of it from
behind textbooks and CRTs.
Reality exists beyond the tattered, dog-eared pages of old QST
issues and ARRL handbooks.
Yes, it does. I and others have pointed that out to you on numerous
occassions and invited you to come out and try it. You've declined. Too much
security in LennieLand.
Fort Huachuca was okay in early spring but I've heard it is uncomfortable
in mid-summer, being in Arizona. Glad I wasn't there in mid-summer.
I HAVE been there in mid-summer...and late summer when it's actually worse.
On several occassions.
Sandia Laboratories is different. But, I can't talk much about that
except that visit concerned things like SID.
Ahhhhhhhhhh.......I see.
Someone else suggests some "security" issues and you try to denigrate them
for it.
You think you're promoting your "insiderness" and you wave it like a flag.
No, not "rife." :-) If you are trying a larger vocabulary, try to get
something somewhat close to correct...and in context.
Yes...rife was correct and in context.
You are trying to "poison the well" by singling out only specific
instances of what I've mentioned as to experiences and work over
the last 51+ years.
In other words, I hit the mark so close that you'll be dressing the wounds
from the "collateral damage" for days.
None of it has anything to do with Amateur Radio.
Radio is radio, regardless of the differentiation that mere human
regulation makers make of its differences.
Only in your mind, Lennie.
If that assertion was so true, you'd have no basis for your OTHER rants
that insist that Amateurs must spend thier time learning about "other" radio
services.
If "Radio is radio", your other assertions are baseless.
The Pacific Stars & Stripes did not include a nice photo I made
of the MARS antenna newly installed at Hardy Barracks in
1955.
And they didn't use the pictures I had of the Loch Ness monster either,
Lennie.
"Dictating" what you said?
Absolutely. You are outraged that anyone dare confront your
ideas and fantasies with actual, real-life experiences. The same
with several others in here.
Why is it that all those "others" are focused on YOU, Lennie?
Perhaps YOU are the one with the perception problems?
That's a rhetorical question, of course. With absolutely NO experience in
Amateur Radio, we know you have no informed, valid expereicen from which to
base your comments.
The dictatorial attitude is fairly common, done with heckling
and name-calling and general denigration in an effort to make
a poster stop writing. Weak intimidation. Works sometimes,
but is not a guarantee of suppressing truth and reality.
And therein lies the bane of your existence...
Still having a hard time wondering why your "superior intellect" can't
squash all those "lesser beings" with your infinite wisdom.....
Too bad you can't objectively review what you just wrote against your
conduct over the last several years.
No one in this forum has made any such assertion. Even those who
staunchly support Morse Code testing have advocated advancement in the
service.
...by more and more manual telegraphy use, praising its supposed
qualities, and generally getting into silly stuff about how it's so much
"better" than any other mode.
Note use of the word "service" again.
Hmmmmmm....The FCC uses it to describe Amateur Radio.
The Commissioners are not licensed Amateurs...Lord knows none of them hold
ANY form of licensure by the FCC.
YOU frequently point out the Commissioners status.
Are you NOW telling us that the language used by those very same
Commissioners is WRONG...?!?!
Military surrogate use. Desire to make amateur radio much
more than it is by trying to identify a hobby with military service.
That's YOUR schtick, Lennie.
Tsk, tsk. Lost focus.
Nope. Never have.
I encourge you to provide even ONE quote that supports your assertion
to
the contrary....
Heh heh heh. No, "encourage" is the wrong word. You
CHALLENGE. You DEMAND.
It would be a "challenge" to you, Lennie...In as much as the quotes you
need do not exist.
You all but hop up and down in spiteful hollering to try to
divert the discussion.
Nope...It's right on. You make all sorts of assinine assertions about
Amateur Radio in general and some Amateurs in particular, then can NEVER back
up your assertions.
You make assertions of fact.
I want you to validate them.
You never do. You CLAIM to be a "radio professional". You are not now
nor ever were anything of the kind.
I don't resent your alleged engineering career, Lennie. I know
several
electronics engineers, and they are fine fellows who make meaningful
contributions.
I'm sure you have "Jewish best friends," too.
I don't have to make such claims, Lennie.
You seem to make a lot of them, though.
You are NOT a fine fellow, and there's more than a few indicators that
your "contribution" to radio communications were limited to your few
articles
sold to Ham Radio magazine. (No doubt a last resort in "getting published"
since I am sure the professional journals cut you off at the knees.)
You can check out McGraw-Hill's old biweekly Electronics and
Designer's Casebook. You can check out Microcomputing, a former
monthly for personal computerists. You can check out BYTE
magazine as well as BYTE Books on articles concerning
circuit simulation. All reviewed and accepted by others.
But not accepted as "PROFESSIONAL" publishing.
If you tried to pass off "credentials" like some hobbyist periodicals as
"profesional publishing", you'd be laughed out of the IEEE.
You want to make a Big Thing about Ham Radio Magainze
going "defunct" back in 1990...even though HR was considered a
leader in U.S. ham periodicals for technical information...which it
was. The "defunction" was due to a shrinking ham advertising
market already begun by 1990. That shrinking is even affecting
QST. It hit 73 Magazine big time. Unlike QST which can get
support from the ARRL membership monies, HR and 73 were
independent publications whose entire income was derived by
advertising. CQ is the same way and is barely hanging on.
The "shrinking ham advertising" was due to a lack of support of consumers.
No consumers = no advertising monies = defunct.
Corporate advertisers do not spend thier advertising monies where it is
not netting a reasonable return.
If "Ham Radio" had been the marvel of publishing accomplishment you'd care
to have us beleive, it would still be actively published instead of being
polished and repackaged as a CD novelty.
"73" lost it's readership because Wayne Green is a senile idiot who ran
it into the ground...not once, but twice. And how many "QRP" and "antenna
specials" can one magazine run in a year...?!?! And those "editiorials"...?!?!
Sheeeesh! Talk about being the poster boy for "Paranoia Today"....
Even then I can't find a single example where any of your "work" was
original, nor can I find any example of where your "contributions" were
complimentary to the advancement of ANY radio communications discipline.
Tsk, tsk, tsk. Having nursie as a critic is like having a blind
color coordinator for interior decoration. :-)
Try to differentiate between "compliment" and "complement."
In either use of either word, there is no professional historical
documentation that would indicate that Leonard H. Anderson did anything other
than sweep floors in ANY "aerospace" installation or facility.
And as far as your "contributions" to Amateur Radio via your HR pieces, I
find no occassion where your work was footnooted, included or otherwise madse
part-and-parcel of any other paper or work.
And I did look. Closely.
Poor nursie...never could take an opposite opinion to his in
here and is bitterly resentful to anyone who had spoken out
in opposition to him.
I am only "bitterly resentful" of pathological liars and persons who
proactively seek to cause
What am I "seeking to cause?" Sentence unfinished.
Yep...I changed a sentence prior to "sending" and clipped it.
Here's the full sentence: "I am only 'bitterly resentful' of pathological
liars who proactively seek to cause harm to Amateur Radio for no other purpsoe
than to sate his own ego".
What are "pathological liars," nursie?
You are a pathological liar, Lennie.
You can't tell or acknowledge the truth. Your lying is habitual. Even
when you DO quote or recite factual information, who can trust you?
Nursie no gots da
edumcation in sykology, sointanly ain't gots no certificates
(suitable for framing, hanging on da wall) as a licensed
shrink.
No licensure as a mental health worker, Lennie. True.
However I DO have certifications in Emergency Nursing, in and among which
is included managing psychiatric emergencies.
Which is one more than YOU have.
And it's too bad YOU don't avail yourself of the "hum radio magazines".
(Your true colors are showing, Scumbag.)
A long-time radio amateur used to say "hum radio."
And you are not a "long time radio amateur". Never were, and God willing,
never will be.
I find it QUITE "enlightening" to keep an eye on you.
Nursie is OBSESSED. Is COMPELLED to mean-mouth
others who go against his opinions.
Nope...not "mean-mouth".
Expose. As if it took any effort to do...
And if you didn't post such foolishness, I wouldn't have anything to work
with. HARDLY "obsessed".
And I am still waiting for you to post your credentials to tell us what
qualified you to make determinations as to what is or isn't "good mental
health". Leafing through wifey's correspondence courses doesn't qulify.
Sicko words are sicko words to lay people, nursie.
Well, Lennie, I am neither "lay people", nor am I the "sicko" that you
insinuate.
And still waiting on your psychiatry credentials.
Steve, K4YZ