View Single Post
  #82   Report Post  
Old July 16th 04, 11:23 PM
William
 
Posts: n/a
Default

PAMNO (N2EY) wrote in message ...
In article ,

(Len Over 21) writes:


AMATEUR radio is a hobby, not a national service, not an arm of the
United States Navy or the rest of the military, and not a public safety
organization. Just a hobby involving radio.


It's not "just a hobby".


It is for most of the participants.

But even if it were, what's the difference? If something is "just a hobby",
does that mean there should be no standards, no training, no rules?


The FCC does not mandate training, does not mandate operating. It
simply has a mechanism in place for VEC's to examine applicants, for
the issuance and renewal of licenses, publication of regulations, and
rarely issues a citation.

The FCC does not run contests, sprints, DXCC, field days, or nets.

AMATEUR radio long ago CEASED to be a "pool of experienced morse
operators" for any national need.


When did it cease, Len?


"long ago"

And here's a fun fact: The Basis and Purpose never used the phrase "experienced
morse operators". Just "experienced operators" - no mention of modes.


So the Basis and Purpose never emphasized (favored) one mode over
another.

Wonder where that come from?

The nation does NOT need morse operators, haven't for a long time.


How long?


"a long time"

Jim, did you realize that a code exam is a disincentive to CW use?