Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
From: (William)
Date: 8/20/2004 2:47 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
...
"William" wrote in message
om...
(Jim Hampton) wrote in message
. com...

Jim, for a whole class of licensees, there absolutely were CW Only
subbands. And if my memory serves, higher class licensees had to
abide by the mode and power restrictions.

Where's Miccolis with his ham history cliff notes?

Look at your FCC rule book.

I don't have one from 15 years ago. I thought they had to abide by
the Novice restrictions.

Who needs one from 15 years ago, Brain?

Band assignments still exist fo Novice class licensees in present Part 97.

They had to abide by the power restrictions on
15m, 40m, and 80m in the novice subbands but not in the 10m novice subband.
In the 10m novice subband, Generals and higher could use full legal limit.
In all of those novice subbands, they were NOT restricted to the mode
requirements of the novices. READ YOUR RULEBOOK!!! These rules have been
in effect for longer than I have been licensed (1992) and I have copies of
the rule books for this time period.

Thanks Dee. Looks like I was wrong, and I stand corrected.

Apologies to Jim and Kelly.

SOMEONE DIAL 9-1-1 IN PICKERINGTON OHIO AND FIND OUT WHO KIDNAPPED BRIAN
BURKE! ! ! ! ! ! !

Bravo, Brian. Bravo.

Now, let's work on the truth about the authorization for your alleged
Somalia operation and try and get some validation for that assertion about
"unlicensed devices playing a major role in emergency communications" thing
working while you're on a roll!

73

Steve, K4YZ