Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
From: (William)
Date: 8/20/2004 5:50 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message
...
Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
From: "Dee D. Flint"
Date: 8/20/2004 7:54 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"William" wrote in message

Jim, for a whole class of licensees, there absolutely were CW Only
subbands. And if my memory serves, higher class licensees had to
abide by the mode and power restrictions.

Where's Miccolis with his ham history cliff notes?

Look at your FCC rule book. They had to abide by the power restrictions
on
15m, 40m, and 80m in the novice subbands but not in the 10m novice
subband.
In the 10m novice subband, Generals and higher could use full legal limit.
In all of those novice subbands, they were NOT restricted to the mode
requirements of the novices. READ YOUR RULEBOOK!!! These rules have been
in effect for longer than I have been licensed (1992) and I have copies of
the rule books for this time period.

Dee, your operating on the presumption that Brain can read, let alone
comprehend what he reads. Big stretch there!

73

Steve, K4YZ

Wrong again, diminuitive man. Read my next reply to Dee.

I did Brian! I did!

And it only took YOU a week of hammering the same thing through to
you for you to FINALLY get it!

Kudos again on sucking-it-up and apologizing to Jim Miccolis and Brian
Kelly. You forgot to add Dee in the mix, but hey, it was a first for you so we
can let you make it up later.

73

Steve, K4YZ