RadioBanter - View Single Post

September 19th 04, 12:23 AM

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: Doing Battle? Can't Resist Posting?
From: (William)
Date: 9/17/2004 5:46 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message
...
Subject: Doing Battle? Can't Resist Posting?
From: (William)
Date: 9/16/2004 5:14 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(N2EY) wrote in message
...

Just for starters. Actually I've lost track of how many different names
Len
has
made up for me. Seems he just can't bring himself to call me "Jim" or
"N2EY",
even though I call him "Len" or "Mr. Anderson".

I can call you Jim. Doesn't matter because you don't like my message.

But Len and Biran get you to call them "Putz", "Loser", "Brain" and
"PuppetBoy", just for starters. Which is probably their entire game,
really.

Ahem, that's "Brian." And we don't "get him to call us" anything.
Steve does so on the free volition of any number of his various
personalities.

Oh, I have no "various personalities", Brian.

You must.

Just K4YZ. Not any one of several different screen names or
nomme-de-guerre, such as yourself, Brian.

Who is K4CAP?

Still me. Or was.

K4CAP is just an FCC assigned call sign. It was mine briefly. Until May
of 2005 it can be mine again without waiting 2 years.

Dave thinks that callsigns are hams. He forgets that there'sa real
person behind the call/

It wasn't an alias for me. I still sign my posts "Steve". The
combination of letters and number on FCC Form 660 does not dictate who I am.

Tell David about it.

The other is because last month Brain stated others "can't help
yourself, you have to respond...".

Prove him wrong.

Please do. It'll be a first.

Guess they have a hard time with objectivity, not that we had any
doubts.

Of course. So why play their game?

I can be Quiteobjective. Try me with some rational discourse.

More like "Quiteobjectionable", Brian.

And try the "rational discourse" yourself. Start with some validation
of
your "Unlicensed services play a major role in emergency comms" assertion.

Steve, K4YZ

I was talking to Jim.

Sorry, Brian. You posted in a public, unmoderated forum.

Your posts are open fare.

Sorry, Steve, but you you've blown it in the rational discourse
department. Try it with someone else.

Sorry, Brian, you've not proven a thing.

You still have unanswered questions vis-a-vis Amateur Radio other there.
We're still waiting and wondering...Will you ever fess up, or was your
admission of never getting DXCC approval for your "T5" operation the only
acknowledgement we'll ever see that your claims are bogus?

Steve, K4YZ

You still owe an apology for your homosexual and pedophilia inuendo.

Best of Luck.