Thread
:
foreign amateur radio policy
View Single Post
#
32
October 26th 04, 01:31 PM
Steve Robeson, K4CAP
Posts: n/a
(William) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: foreign amateur radio policy
From:
(William)
Date: 10/24/2004 7:26 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
Steve, I detect a note of green envy whenever I mention my DX
operations. Get over it.
Get over WHAT, Brain?
The jealosy.
BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
"Jealous" over things you have no proof of...?!?!
You have brought up before how I've operated from
locations that most hams would die for.
No...I've brought up how you've CLAIMED to operated from places
most hams would die for!
I might add that there
actually was an element of danger in some of the locations.
Uh huh.
Not a single bit of it is documented as having happened (that I am aware
of).
No DXCC. No announcements in any of the journals. Nothing. Just your
"word" and THAT has already been PROVEN to be dubious, at best.
Doesn't have to be. You just don't like it that I operated from those
rare locations.
I don't care WHERE you CLAIM you operated from, Brain!
With the exception of Somalia, I have QSL cards from all of them.
In many cases from YEARS before you claimed to have been there!
And I presented the number of countries
that I worked because you asked.
I didn't ask you how many countries you worked, Brain. (Anyone remember a
post from this scumbag in the last 24 hours "chastising" others for "twisting
words"???)
You'll need to show where you didn't reference the number of countries
worked.
I asked you where you stood on the DXCC, Brain...Not how many
countries you claimed to have worked.
But since you seem to have a need for getting your nose rubbed in
your own misquotes, I am glad to accomodate. PLEASE FOLLOW THE
DATE/TIME/GROUP:
Here was my question to you:
Message 9 in thread
From: Steve Robeson K4CAP )
Subject: foreign amateur radio policy
View this article only
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
Date: 2004-10-23 01:25:27 PST
Subject: foreign amateur radio policy
From:
(William)
Date: 10/22/2004 7:03 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
Hans, please note that I said various, and not "all." Anyone can
bumble about and get 180 or 190 so called countries.
So what's YOUR problem...?!?!
BBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
AHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! !
That last 40 or
so probably require a slightly different strategy.
Of course YOU know this from your lofty postion of number...WHAT,
on the
DXCC roll...?!?!
Would you choose
to remain ignorant of the operating priveleges of those last forty
countries, or would you work smarter, not harder?
Please, Brain, P L E A S E give us all those juicy operating
tips that
you've leared over the years that got YOU onto the DXCC Honor
Roll...?!?!
ROTMFFLMMFAO!
Steve, K4YZ
END QUOTE:
To which you replied:
QUOTE:
Message 10 in thread
From: William )
Subject: foreign amateur radio policy
View this article only
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
Date: 2004-10-23 16:55:45 PST
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: foreign amateur radio policy
From:
(William)
Date: 10/22/2004 7:03 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
Hans, please note that I said various, and not "all." Anyone can
bumble about and get 180 or 190 so called countries.
So what's YOUR problem...?!?!
BBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
AHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! !
No problem. I have worked over 180 countries while stationed on Guam.
That last 40 or
so probably require a slightly different strategy.
Of course YOU know this from your lofty postion of number...WHAT, on the
DXCC roll...?!?!
Would you choose
to remain ignorant of the operating priveleges of those last forty
countries, or would you work smarter, not harder?
Please, Brain, P L E A S E give us all those juicy operating tips that
you've leared over the years that got YOU onto the DXCC Honor Roll...?!?!
ROTMFFLMMFAO!
Steve, K4YZ
END QUOTE:
Two things are noteworthy. Your rearranging of attributes and the
previously discussed misquote.
The question was ""Of course YOU know this from your lofty position of
number...WHAT, on the DXCC roll...?!?!"
You are not ON the DXCC roll, Brain...Not under ANY of the calls you have
cited.
Papers, I demand your papers! OK, Sgt Shultz.
Still no proof. Still just a boast until proven otherwise.
As far as DXCC goes, I don't need the ARRL involved.
I am sure Dave Sumner is laying awake at night distraught that you won't
send all those juicy "DX" QSL's in for verification.
Let me reference Part 97 where it says that I must participate in DXCC
if I want to work DX or be DX.
It's got nothing to do with Part 97, Brain.
It has to do with your complete lack of credibility and
documented mistruthfulness.
Hi, hi! I hope you're holding your breath because it will be a long,
long time before I'm able to post something like that.
No problem.
It will be an even LONGER time till you're able to post any
LEGITIMATE DX operating claimns, in as much as none of it seems to be
documented.
I neither ask for "thier" approval nor
endorsements. The DX is in my logs, and if the other station wants a
card, all they have to do is QSL me through the buro. By the way,
you're not in my /KH2 logs, so don't bother. And Jim's no longer the
KH2 Buro manager, so don't try to wrangle one out of him either.
No problem, Brain.
Apparently so. You demand to see my papers, my DXCC number, my shoe
size.
I could care less about your shoe size, Brain. Your foot seems
to fit in your mouth just fine without it.
And as long as there's nothing to back up your claims of operating
from these DX locales, there's no proof you were there except for
military orders, and that STILL does not substantiate any validity of
AMATEUR RADIO operation.
I have KH2 worked, confirmed AND annotated for DXCC.
All bands, all modes?
Just needed it once, Brain.
However I have confirmed it in three modes...CW, SSB and RTTY. I
worked it on PSK31, but no card yet.
And the ONLY person who can't see what a FOOL you are is YOU!
Sheeeeeesh!
Nope, the quote is correct enough. Quitecorrect! You don't get to
slither out of it on a technicality.
No slithering.
No "technicality".
You are a fool, and you are, seemingly, unaware of it.
Maybe you'll explain to Rev. Jim the MMF part. I've notice that he's
been letting some stuff slide on through uncensored.
Perhaps you'll apologize for having at once claimed you didn't
misquote me and then had it spoon fed back to you.
Best of Luck potty mouth.
Coming from you, Brain, this means something?
Steve, K4YZ
Reply With Quote
