wrote in message 
... 
 JAMES HAMPTON  wrote: 
  Hi gang! 
 
  I just had an interesting question pop into my head; one to which I have 
no 
  answer. 
 
  I have a couple of friends in British Columbia.  Both are licensed hams 
and 
  I've left messages for one of them with his father (the other licensed 
ham) 
  as he is not within repeater contact. 
 
  I noticed our agreement with England includes only special event 
stations. 
  Should I have two friends in England and both were amateur radio 
operators, 
  could I legally ask for one to pass a message to the other to meet on a 
  particular repeater?  This would *not* be with a special event station. 
  Would passing traffic through a ham to another ham be considered 3rd 
party? 
 
  No, I'm not trying it, I'm just curious as to what would constitute 3rd 
  party traffic. 
 
 
  Best regards from Rochester, NY 
  Jim AA2QA 
 
 When all else fails, you might read 97.115: 
 
 Sec.  97.115  Third party communications. 
 
     (a) An amateur station may transmit messages for a third party to: 
     (1) Any station within the jurisdiction of the United States. 
     (2) Any station within the jurisdiction of any foreign government 
 whose administration has made arrangements with the United States to 
 allow amateur stations to be used for transmitting international 
 communications on behalf of third parties. No station shall transmit 
 messages for a third party to any station within the jurisdiction of any 
 foreign government whose administration has not made such an 
 arrangement. This prohibition does not apply to a message for any third 
 party who is eligible to be a control operator of the station. 
 
 
 Notice the last sentence. 
 
 -- 
 Jim Pennino 
 
 Remove -spam-sux to reply. 
 
Hello, Jim 
 
Interesting - and it might prove real interesting for a message for a tech 
given the message on HF voice from another country ....(!) ... it might get 
knotty ... if the station is in the novice portion of the cw band on hf and 
running 200 watts or less, then a tech with code might be able to receive 
the message .... if not .... hmmm .... 
 
Yet another big gap in regulations .... 
 
I can see there is no clear answer (yet) to my query. 
 
 
 
Best regards from Rochester, NY 
Jim AA2QA 
 
 
 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |