In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote:

snip
Yep. Post it.


Sure,,,,,here we have N3CVJ not only intentionally, wanton, willful,
breaking of federal communication law as set forth and defined by the
FCC (shouldn't a hammie of his status know better?) but committing
behavior that is construed by many LEOs to be of pedophilia-like nature,
of which ALL experts believe there is NO cure, only a time span until
they approach another child.
I mean, Frankie,,you just claimed in another thread that there is NO
excuse for breaking the law pertaining to the airwaves....according to
Hall himself, you condone this type behavior he commits...hmmmm,,,but
you hae a problem with DX and freebanding.LOL....your priorities are
whacked, Frankie, and I am certain beyond any doubt whatsoever, not one
person in this group would want either of you near any children.
.
From: Dave Hall
Subject: WhAt FrEqUeNcEy DoEs A mObLiE pHoNe OpPeRaTe On? Date:
1999/12/16
Message-ID: #1/1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References:

Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: tw12.nn.bcandid.com 945352043 207.224.84.38 (Thu, 16 Dec 1999
06:47:23 MST) Organization: Spew Radio Inc. MIME-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 06:47:23 MST Newsgroups:
rec.radio.cb
Who needs "Melrose Place" when you have a scanner? My neighborhood phone
traffic was no less juicy at times. Teenaged girls talking about their
first time with sex

Hmmm.... seems that there is more to that post than what you quoted... let's put
it in context by adding the rest of his post, shall we?

......, wife talking to newly found lover while hubby
watched Monday Night Football in the next room, guys making drug buys,
and even caught one neighbor bitching about ME and all my "radio stuff"
to another.

It's fun to try to figure out who all those voices belong to. Sometimes
more entertaining than TV, becasue it's REAL......

Dave
"Sandbagger"

When not taken out of context, it doesn't sound like pedophilia to me or to any
other reasonable person, which is clearly why you have pulled it out of context
and interpreted it as such.

While there is no doubt that eavesdropping on private conversations is illegal
(and if you have ever read my website you would know that I'm not a big fan of
cordless or cell phones for just that reason), it doesn't interfere with the
conversation or cause any harm or inconvenience. Unless someone is listening for
purposes other than a morbid curiousity, I really don't have a problem with
scanners. I do -not- condone eavesdropping on private conversations. But the
fact is that it does happen, and I -do- warn people about using cordless phones.

Despite all that, the FCC has recognized the issue of eavesdropping on cordless
phones and has taken steps in order to impede the efforts of those that would
listen to private conversations for personal gain or the commission of a crime.
As the older, unsecure phones find their way to the trash heaps, the issue is
gradually becoming moot.

_
Oh, wait a second, youre still tripping over your hairlipped lie looking
for that post you claimed I said the same thing about you in,,,,,,still
waiting, Frankie,,,you mean you lied? Again? Gee...

"I have admitted to lying in this ng and on

more than

one occasion." Frank

Gilliland )

BTW,,,what happened to that Vancouver
feed?

Never had one.

LOL...hokay!
Your Time Warner (TWTelecom) is in Vancouver, Frankie.

My ISP is in Spokane, Twisty.

"I have admitted to lying in this ng, and on

more than one occasion"




Ah never mind,,,,one thing
at a time,,,,,now, about those RF pirates that
you claimed affected your daily work...

Do you want to know the names of the most obnoxious offenders in this area?






-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----