View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Old February 4th 04, 12:56 PM
Dave Hall
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 15:15:04 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:

And some will be criminals. This is what I mean,,this is the mindest of
Philthydelphia,,,,this kind of stuff is not only taught but avidly
defended. Children do not take to violence as a natural act. They are a
product of their environment.
The act was against the law.


So is operating a CB radio on unauthorized frequencies, yet you
vehemently attempt to justify your decision to ignore federal law.


As long as it doesn't get taken to the extreme


level



The courts determined long ago this "level" you speak of, and they have
distinguished such behavior as illegal and in violation of the law for
good reason. Forcibly intruding and imposing your will against an
unconsenting individual IS taking it to the "extreme level."
Try that on an educated adult and see where it lands you,,,,,,in the
most fortunate scenario, one may need a physician. In an unfortunate
scenario, one may require an undertaker.
Then again, most educated adults know better than to forcibly place
their unwanted hands on another's person.



Most educated adults realize the importance of R.F. spectrum
management and the importance of following the federal rules which
govern them.


No comparison to rape, either. The court recognizes such, which is why
the laws and sentencing guidelines differ between the examples you
offer. The acts can not be compared.
They broke the law with their acts, despite you disagreeing with the
law. Many times in the past, condoning the breaking of selective laws
has been vehemently attacked by yourself.


I find it ironic that you would be so quick to uphold the letter of
the law in this case, yet so easily ignore the law with respect to
radio. This is just another shining example of your hypocrisy.


In case you were wondering, yes, you took the bait and sprung the
trap.....



Dave
"Sandbagger"