(I Am Not George) wrote in
m:

"Peter" wrote in message
...
"harvey" wrote in message
...
ok after a few monhts of reading here and some digging, my
assumptions are thus:
keyclowns:

snip

The theory is that Keyclowns are illegal CBers, and Antikeyclowns
those who oppose illegal CB. However, that is all just a cover for
the truth. Some people are just hell bent against CB and those
who use it - as demonstrated by their inability to post CB related
messages, and their use of the term "keyclown" being aimed at anyone
they dislike - without any proof of any kind that they use any
illegal CB of any kind.

The homosexual hate messages are just the physical manifestation
of the mental problems within the minds of those who hate some
people so much that they will chase them around trying to anoy them.
Rather than trying to make their own lives better and more enjoyable,
they wish to make other people as unhappy and mentally unwell as
themselves.

Although they try to mask what they are with some claim to respect
for the law, they are often unmasked as their own criminal activities
or "brushes" with the FCC or police are made public.

That being said, there are some on this group who are pro-legal, some
who are against laws restricting freedom of communications, and
others who walk the line between - believing that the law is often an
ass, and may not always be technically correct.
For example, distance rules. In America, you have a "No DX" rule. If
you do not reply to a signal, does that mean it did not go over that
distance? This law is often seen as a technically unsound and
legally unenforceable law.

Here in the UK, when CB was first legalised, our Government opted to
restrict distance with tech spec rather than trust to some "no DX"
rule. What they did was to put in rules regarding antenna length and
height from the ground.
Those who stuck within the law were radiating 4 Watts of RF at a
height well below that of radio and TV equipment, and often caused
interference. It was soon worked out that, to avoid harmful
interference and grief, the way to go was NOT what the law said. The
rule was broken everywhere, and never enforced. Eventually, the
government saw their error, removed the height rule and relaxed the
length rule, allowing us bigger homebase antennas at any height
within local planning rules.

Some say that stupid laws often needs a hard push before they will be
changed, and illegal action becomes necessary - would the RA have
removed that height rule if CBers had not proved it wrong by their
illegal use? Would the UK Government even be considering changing
outdated and extremely sexist family law if it was not for the
illegal actions of Batman and Robin?
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydispl...1355&thesectio
n=news&thesubsection=world
http://www.itv.com/news/index_1789720.html
http://www.fathers-4-justice.org

I wouldn't have liked to be the person who had to make the call to
the queen...
"Sorry to bother you, your majesty... but Batman is on
your ledge, and he's asking to speak to you."
Aparently she watched it on TV.


Regards,

Peter.
http://www.citizensband.radiouk.com/


Hey brummy anyone can see steveo and his sock pals contribute there
fair share of **** in this NG. You forget they are too dumb to know
doug has got them by the balls he is playing them sometimes using the
same posts over again to jerk them around.


Been trolling in the [uk.rec.radio.cb] lately, humpy-puppet?


http://tinyurl.com/5of42