"DR. Death" wrote...
"Peter" wrote in message
...

Post snipped for brevity...
against laws restricting freedom of communications

"freedom of communications" only pertains to verbal communications
not radio or TV ect.
I can only surmise you believe you have rights in this issue the same as
others believe they have the right to drive a car.


Please go back to the parts you snipped, AND READ THEM.
Where do I say that I believe I have such rights, or that I believe in
certain freedoms?

I note that, although I refer to some people being "pro-legal", you do not
accuse me of referring to myself at that point.

I get the idea that you select a certain part and twist it to mean something
different, so that you can feel the need to argue over something.
To back up your argument, you take PART of a sentence totally out of context
to use as a suggestion that I am on a certain side.


Peter.