RadioBanter - View Single Post

January 7th 05, 07:34 PM

On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:34:54 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

No one understands your "dynamics" nor your "empiricle evdence" nor your
incorrect blathers about echo and roger beeps being illegal on cb.

No, only you have a problem with straight talk. You prefer speaking
with forked tongue.

That you are unable to find a rule expressly permitting roger beeps on
cb, is all the "dynamics" on needs to understanding your twisted world.

Already addressed. Move on.

(You know all about paybacks right?).

f you are attempting to draw some type false analogy between my typed
words and your committed actions, you better dig a little deeper in your
desperation bag,,,,,whoops, nothing left.

See, you can comprehend things when you really want to! It's funny
that what you do here today, is so similar to what I used to do in the
1970's. The thing is, in 1974 I was 14, so what's your excuse for your
immature and antisocial behavior today?

Plus, I was a teenager then. That should

explain everything.

No, Dave, you weren't a teenager when you were making these posts, but
good luck on trying to get the contingency to believe your
frequent-flowing lies.

Are you caught in some form of dissociative time warp? The internet
didn't exist (at least not in this form) when I was making noise on
the band. The fact that I can tell stories from back then, does not
mean that I'm still doing the same thing.

If I write a recollection of an event which occurred 30 years ago,
does that mean that what I write about is still true?

I never splattered, never ran huge power, never was a jerk on the air,
even as a child, I not only knew better, I was taught better.

But you see nothing wrong with breaking
federal communications law as an adult? It
would seem that respect for the law was a
subject skipped over when you was "learned".

Respect for the law has abolutely nothing to do with selective
disregardment.

It has EVERYTHING to do with it. How can you claim to respect the law,
when you feel you have the right to ignore it when it suits your
purpose?

But you do, Dave. Your lies come to fast and furious for there to be any
truth in your statements, In fact, you have become one of the most
unreliable posters in this group when it comes to anything at all.

Second only to you in that regard.

All
your posts are suspect, at best.

Only by you. No one else has made any claims of the sort. Except
perhaps Frank, who's smarting a bit because he can't deal with a
conservative who employs logic.

Your agenda has been ilustrated, as has
your hypocrisy, contradictions, deliberate misattributions to others,
and lies, But then again, where would this group be without lids like
you to keep us ahead of your game...

It would be forced to deal with sociopath like you, and your warped
views on the way the world is.

It would seem that you still need to mature
enough to learn respect for the law...

I have incredible respect for the law.

And you prove it every day when you disregard the law which prohibits
you from utilizing more than the 40 legal class D channels.

In fact, there are two
sandbaggers in this group howling their azzes off watching you come
apart with such remote accusations. Someday, I may permit you to be
clued in.

Someday I may clue you in to just how a psychological study of your
posting habits was included in someone I know's psychology report on
deviant behaviors.

Dave
"Sandbagger"