"Lancer" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:04:06 -0600, itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote:
"Landshark" wrote in news:y0IEd.10181$5R.3047
:
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 05:19:54 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
om...
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:57:27 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:
From: (Dave Hall) wrote:
The "DX" has nothing to do with the amount of splatter and the
distortion a signal may have. The only effect that "DX" may have is
heterodyning of co-channel signals. In any case, when my
observations
were made, the "DX" was not running heavy enough that a clean sample
of any particular transmission could not be made.
Ummm, no Dave. DX has everything to do with DX splatter.
No, it doesn't. Dx is simply an enhancement of the atmosphere which
allows a signal to propagate farther then normal line of sight. It
does not add "splatter" to an otherwise clean signal.
Ah, that explains everything. So when a normal channel
has maybe 5 to 10 operators, add another 100 because of
skip conditions, of course there will be some running
clipped & mod radio's, you don't think that enhances
the splatter?
Sure throwing modded and clipped radios on top of each other sure does
add to the splatter. Big Time, but skip has nothing to do with it, he was
splattering because his radio puts out a dirty signal. Skip has nothing
to do with what comes out the ass end of a radio/amp.
Correct!
Sorry, maybe "cause" is the wrong word. Since some
people here are so word sensitive (Not you Lancer) the
better choice of words would be "Heighten".
Landshark
--
Hard things are put in our way,
not to stop us, but to call out our
courage and strength.