On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:55:38 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:16:34 -0500, Dave Hall
wrote in :

On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 09:27:09 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:


And until Dave can provide an example where one of the allegedly
illegal operators he allegedly heard was found guilty, got an NAL, or
even admitted his guilt publically, then his allegations are nothing
more than his opinions, not facts.

So you are of the Twisted notion that a person is not breaking the
law until they are caught?


Hardly. What I am saying is that conviction requires proof, not
opinion.


Who's "convicting"? I made an observation, based on trained skills.
It's enough to tell me the truth. For me to press charges would
require a higher level of proof. I am not trying to go that route.

Dave
"Sandbagger"