RadioBanter - View Single Post

January 12th 05, 06:03 AM

"Twistedhed" wrote in message
...
From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
(Twistedhed) wrote in news:24437-41E3D8B4-199
@storefull-3252.bay.webtv.net:
From: pam
(itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge)
The Fcc requires no jury of peers. reart 95
Tell that to N3CVJ and his buddy N8WWM. Davie lobbies hard telling the
world that just because the FCC told the world N8WWM was jamming
repeaters, it's not evidence of guilt.

It is not evidence of guilt they charged him

with nothing.

N3CVJ says otherwise. He said his empirical observations are evidence of
guilt.

and landshark said you must have a jury of

your peers decide you to be guilty.

Landshark is correct. However, with certain charges brought by the FCC,
exceptions abound.

Agreed. You have to sue the FCC to get your
fined reduced or refunded back to you, that's federal
justice for you.

Landshark

--
__
o /' )
/' ( ,
__/' ) .' `;
o _.-~~~~' ``---..__ .' ;
_.--' b) LANDSHARK ``--...____. .'
( _. )). `-._
`\|\|\|\|)-.....___.- `-. __...--'-.'.
`---......____...---`.___.'----... .' `.;
`-` `