View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
Old January 29th 04, 01:41 AM
Matt
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Rob Mills" wrote in message
news:QGQRb.2735$EW.2331@okepread02...

The other antenna requires alot more horizontal space, which can add to

the wind load. The Scantenna will provide a safer, more-secure mount to a
mast. Jeff

pretty decent results on VHF and UHF. Doesn't seem to work that well on

800 mhz and above. Chris


I am more interested in freq's below 800 as I get great reception on the
local 800 system with just the on-board antenna.

I am smack dab in the middle of tornado alley and have been thinking as

Jeff
mentioned the ground plane will be quite a target. I was considering

selling
one but am now thinking I'll put up the ground plane and keep the

Scantenna
as a spare as I don't have much invested in either.

Is that 9913 a small diameter or large dia coax? Expensive? I'm needing to
put up 2 sw antennas and 1 scanner ant so will need quite a bit. Was
thinking I would use RG6. RM~


9913 cable is a medium sized cable - approx 8mm in diameter, and is
moderately expensive. It is cheap compared to the hardlines like LDK550
(and a damn sight smaller), but more expensive than RG213 or similar (about
the same size though). Sorry I cannot help with the prices, but I am not in
the states so am not aware of what your prices will be like (cheaper than
here in Aust however).




Matt