RadioBanter - View Single Post

January 18th 05, 03:56 AM

Yes, I admit ripping off the from someone ( I
couldn't tell you who) probably
on this group though. I've been lurking around hear for about 10 years under
various email addresses (always as myself though)
I decided to go undercover, so to speak, just to avoid spam. How many
times have I read, just remove the "no spam"
from the address to respond, so I stole somebodies (Arnold?s) original
idea.

I cannot to address the question regarding the attached article. I
re-skimmed yesterday before posting and vaguely
recall that the author stated reception was decent below the designed lower
frequency. believe he mentions
that the design could be modified to extend the range down.

Bruce

"Never anonymous Bud" wrote in message
...
Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, "B L R"
on Sun, 16 Jan 2005 17:32:22 GMT spoke:

I'd LOVE to know why the author calls it VHF/UHF,
when it's low-end is 700mhz??

--

The truth is out there,

but it's not interesting enough for most people.