wrote in :
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:38:33 -0000, "Dr. Artaud"
wrote:
Do you know her personally, or are you relying on information that the
media provided concerning her courageous activities? If you are relying
on the media stories, then you and I are idiots on par.
what an idiot. here's a woman that stood against religious fanaticism
in a country where she could easily be killed for doing so, and the
moron complains about her bravery.
how brave was the pope? who was going to kill him for coming out
against the war? the reason he did so was:
1. it was aligned with france
2 there are millions of arab catholics
Thank you for indicating to the group that there are millions of Arab
Catholics. Though the truth is more like millions of Arab Christians, due
to the Jewish controlled Media, one would believe that all Arabs are
insane Islamics carrying AK47s, all bent on Jihad. Your post has helped
to clarify that the Israelis are killing some Christians that do not
identify with the Islamic ideals.
Jimmy Carter exemplifies courage? Is courage a requirement to receive a
Peace Prize?
hardly an example of courage.
Koffi Annan, ahem, need I say more?
agree on this one.
In 1994, the prize was awarded jointly to, are you ready, drum roll
please, Yasser Arafat, Shimon Peres, and Yitzhak Rabin, the latter 2
from Israel. No doubt that they were afraid to award the Prize to a
single selection from above (don't jump to Jewish Conclusions, I
wouldn't give it to Arafat, that's for sure)
sometimes the committee awards the prize to 'works in progress' in
order to try and drive the process by giving it recognition. a bold
attempt that often fails.
Nelson Mandela and Fredrik Willem De Klerk.
they did deserved it. they produced a revolution in apartheid, ending
it in a country that was torn apart for centuries.
Ah, the liberal fetish with Apartheid.
http://www.gmu.edu/departments/econo...cles/99/After-
Apartheid.htm
http://home.mweb.co.za/sa/savimbi/imagesterror.htm
http://home.mweb.co.za/sa/savimbi/images/terknd.jpg
http://home.mweb.co.za/sa/savimbi/images/tPlaas1.jpg
http://home.mweb.co.za/sa/savimbi/images/tPlaas3.jpg
http://home.mweb.co.za/sa/savimbi/images/tPlaas13.jpg
Ask the above individuals how they feel about the end of Apartheid? As
usual with liberals, they choose to look the other way after they have
accomplished their monomaniacal goals. Truth be known, South Africa is
in a horrendous state, with a declining economy and a failing government.
Murders are at an all time high. Many white farmers are being murdered by
blacks, but the world takes no notice. The white farmers were capable of
sufficient productivity on their farms to make a difference in feeding
the locals. But the locals choose to kill them anyway, not dissimilar to
the shoplifting that goes on in American impoverished areas, driving the
stores away, leaving the people with no place to buy food. But hey, why
let the facts get in the way. (The liberal's credo)
http://capmag.com/article.asp?ID=1376
"Summary: Colonial masters never committed anything near the murder and
genocide seen under black rule in Rwanda, Burundi, Uganda, Nigeria,
Mozambique, Somalia and other countries, where millions of blacks have
been slaughtered in unspeakable ways, which include: hacking to death,
boiling in oil, setting on fire and dismemberment."
http://www.pastornet.net.au/jmm/aame/aame0321.htm
Liberals, you can't live with them, you can live without them.
Dr. Artaud
---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field