You're beinga an idiot. YOu know it, and i know it. Plonk.
"-=jd=-" wrote in message
3...
Dateline "rec.radio.shortwave", Sun, 16 Nov 2003 05:23:29 GMT: As it
appeared in message-ID# news:lRDtb.163913$275.506596@attbi_s53, "CW"
appears to have written the following...

The 100 year rule applies to the US. If you were to sell as an item as
an antique knowing it was only 75 years old, the buyer would have
grounds for a lawsuit. They would win. The definition in the dictionary
simply reflects common usage, not law. It just shows how ignorant people
are.

It shows how silly you look making such an indefensible assertion. Why are
there not scores of lawsuits against DMV's for issuing license plates
officially labelling auto's as little as 25 years old "Antiques"?

Then there are the untold gazillion classified ad's selling auto's,
furniture, any-damn-thing in the "Antiques" section.

In any event 'Clinton', why do you feel the need to reply to so many posts
in
such an a-holish manner? Do you have some form of social disorder that the
newsgroup should be aware of?

-=jd=-
--
My Current Disposable Email:

(Remove YOUR HAT to reply directly)