J999w wrote:
The bench marks have already been made. Read more reviews, especially
those of ham transceivers, eventually you'll get a feeling for the
numbers.

jw
wb9uai

Aaah, but I want it doing for me.:c)

I want someone to agree on a baseline as to what would be "good" specs and
to see in a review something like:

Results against standard baseline performance figures:

FM
Met baseline
Sensitivity: Above
Bandwidth: Yes
Image rejection: Yes
Cross Modulation: Below

A quick table to see at a glance whether the sets specs are good or below,
or better.

I can look at the actual specs after I've cycled thru the quick-read
tables.