"Mark S. Holden" wrote in message
...

If you'd like to read the final report of the New Freedom Commission the
article at the beginning of this thread was criticizing, it's available
at:


http://www.nami.org/Content/ContentG...tlights/Spotli
ght_4/FinalReport.pdf

It is rather long - but this is the actual report.

If nothing else, reading the executive summary will put you in a better
position to understand what they recommend and why.

My feeling is the article at the start of the thread was a smoke screen
- intended to gin up protests before an actual proposal is even made.

Naturally, it will be important to make sure any legislation derived
from this report follows the spirit and intent of the commission's
report before deciding if it's a good bill.


I couldn't see any justification for the use of the original article's term
"manditory" beyond this sentence from the New Freedom Commission's report:

"In a transformed mental health system, the
early detection of mental health problems in
children and adults - through routine and
comprehensive testing and screening - will
be an expected and typical occurrence. "

Still, the phrase "routine and comprehensive testing and screening" deserves
some attention. I really doubt routine and comprehensive testing and
screening is a good idea for people with no symptoms and no risk factors.
Consider testing for cancer. Testing healthy people who have no symptoms
and no risk factors will result in a number of false positives. A number of
people will suffer needless anxiety and some of those will get inapproiate
treatment.

Frank Dresser