View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Old October 6th 04, 06:55 PM
Frank Dresser
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Doc Gorpon" wrote in message
...
Hi. I know very little about shortwave radios. However, I do like

listening to
late night talk radio. And my area only has mostly a selection of politics

and
sports, which I don't like. So I would like to be able to hear some other
stations that my local carriers don't carry.
I'm also a lover of tube radios. I figured I'd kill two stones and get a

tube
shortwave radio. I know that the newer, digital radios probably sound

better.

Generally, I think tube radios sound better.


But I'm willing to sacrifice a little sound for astetics as long as it's

still
usable for my needs.
I'm basically keeping an eye out for something around $60. I've seen a few
things fly by on Ebay that both look good and claim to "work".
Anything I should be aware of? Any online shops available for these types

of
radios besides ebay?
Thanks


Can you solder? At the $60 price level, you'll probably get a radio with
original paper capacitors and carbon resistors. These parts don't age well,
particularly the capacitors. It only costs a few bucks and a few hours to
replace the capacitors and check/replace the resistors. After these
replacements, the radio might be as good as new, and more dependable than
new.

Here's a rundown from Phil Nelson's excellent site:

http://antiqueradio.org/begin.htm

Sixty bucks might buy a recapped Hallicrafters S-38 or S-120.

If audio quality is important, keep an eye out for a Grundig console. These
are very good sounding radios, and are decent performers. The consoles are
often seem to go for fifty bucks or so. They will need new capacitors.

You never know what you will find, once you start looking . I got my
Hallicrafters SX-62, which is a high performance, high fidelity radio for
seventy bucks. All 40+ paper capacitors were bad, as well as a bunch of
resistors. Right now, it's working fine. Sounds even better than the
Grundig. I wouldn't recommend it as a first repair, however.

Frank Dresser