wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote:

wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote:


wrote:



Looks like somebody cottoned on to what some hams are doing:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6843771


Quick! Someone tell them it won't work!! ;^)


I'll pass on your troll for now Michael. But I *will* be back later

. .

bank it.



I'm trolling when I answer Jim's email?


This ain't an e-mail circuit.


I stopped discussing the matter
in this group.


Uhh . . why . . ?

I'll answer this one, but let me bow out of any more.

There just wasn't much reason to continue the discussions. Whereas I
wanted some discussion about possibilities, a lot of what I got was in
the form of how things that were being done on a regular basis -
couldn't be done.

So what do I do? An awful lot of people might get sarcastic and snide
about it, but I prefer not to. Sometimes discretion is gritting your
teeth and moving on.

If I launch a balloon, and it goes to 50 Kfeet, then I suppose it means
I'm a failure, and if I report a 100Kfeet launch and successful
retrieval, I guess I'm rubbing it in.

Obviously it was naivety for me to expect a response other than what I
received, don't you agree? 8^)

- Mike KB3EIA -