Mike Coslo wrote:
drwxr-xr-x wrote:
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 11:49:26 -0500, Ken hath writ:
On 2 Dec 2004 16:22:01 GMT, drwxr-xr-x wrote:
Nice antenna topic!
You do have a point, but why waste the bandwith to respond -- if you
don't have a helpful suggestion. It is at least a radio question.
And, this ng does _not_ address radios.
Your comment and the general lack of response did make me think to
post it to sci.electronics.basics.
Yes-sir-ee, Bob. When ever I have an *equipment* question, I would
never think to post it in a ng covering *equipment* (like
rec.radio.amateur._equipment_), where all the participants are focused
on discussing *equipment*. No, my brilliant choice would be to
post my *equipment* question in ... let's see .. an *ANTENNA* ng.
You made your point. Just be glad you are smarter than other people.
- Mike -
I agree with 755.
|