On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:12:12 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:12:10 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
David T. Hall wrote:
In Pa. they are required to give 5 MPH to take

care of "Speedometer" and speed measuring

inaccuracies

I am glad you availed yourself the facts of the matter and reclarified
your bull**** above with:

Well, in all honesty, it mostly is at the cop's

discretion,

It's more of an unwritten rule in Pa., that they

"give" you 5 MPH,

That's a far cry from you claiming it was a "requirement" the Pa. police
*give* you the extra speed of a few miles per hour. Nevertheless, you
illustrate once again you speak of things you know nothing of (the law)
and do not need Frank to make you reverse your earlier position. Since
you realized your error, there is no need to provide you with the Pa.
vehicle code. Flip-flop.

You're right. I shouldn't have deviated from my original stance since,
as it turns out, I was right about it.

See:

http://members.aol.com/StatutesP1/75PA3368.html

Pay particular attention to 3368 (c) number 4., which states:

"No person may be convicted upon evidence obtained through the use of
devices authorized by paragraphs (2) and (3) unless the speed recorded
is six or more miles per hour in excess of the legal speed limit.
Furthermore, no person may be convicted upon evidence obtained through
the use of devices authorized by paragraph (3) in an area where the
legal speed limit is less than 55 miles per hour if the speed recorded
is less than ten miles per hour in excess of the legal speed limit.
This paragraph shall not apply to evidence obtained through the use of
devices authorized by paragraph (3) within a school zone"



So what were you saying about knowing the law?


Dave
"Sandbagger"

True to form, you


Ahhh,,,,unable to defend the topic, junior does what all unskilled and
uneducated louts do,,,they attack the chatter. Dave, you have always
been a lid and have one hell of a time debating void of emotion. Get
educated, junior.

show up to pick yet another

bowl of nits.

So sorry you feel persecuted again, Junior, yet, illustrating your
self-contradictory claims has a rather unnerving effect on you. Call it
whatever your bruised ego dictates, you talk sideways.


It is an unwritten "requirement" in order to

avoid the pain of fighting in court.


What insight,,,,if it's "unwritten", it doesn't exist as a requirement,
Dave, no matter WHAT you try to explain you "mean" by it.

The courts have a history of throwing out



(snip)

Not relevant. Your claim that is was a requirement degraded to your
current claim it is now a "unwritten" requirement, yet, according to
you, 'friends' of yours are cops who affirmed both your claims. Well,
Dave, you are full of **** again. I posed your question to several LEOs
in a traffic forum and you are wrong. Need the URL? Care to join me
where you can be educated by actual Pa. leos?

speed citations for small amounts, due to the

potential for inaccuracies in both the car

speedometer and the speed measuring

devices.



The success rate for having these

fines "stick" increases greatly when the

amounts exceed 5 MPH over.


And has nothing to do with any "unwritten requirement". If it is
unwritten, it can not be a requirement LEOs must follow.

I've gotten the same story from several

different cops who work in different precincts

and the state police.


LOL,,sure, sure, just like those you claimed agreed with you that roger
beeps are illegal, only you menstruate when asked to actually provide
for such a claim.
No, you haven't been told that by any Pa. cop, and the LEO forum serves
to illustrate your degeneration caused by pathological lies.

David T. Hall Jr

n3cvj

"Sandbagger"