View Single Post
  #52   Report Post  
Old February 15th 05, 04:53 PM
Twistedhed
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:12:12 -0500,
(I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
From:
(Dave=A0Hall)
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:12:10 -0500,
(I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
David T. Hall wrote:
In Pa. they are required to give 5 MPH to take


care of "Speedometer" and speed measuring


inaccuracies


I am glad you availed yourself the facts of the matter and reclarified
your bull**** above with:

Well, in all honesty, it mostly is at the cop's


discretion,


It's more of an unwritten rule in Pa., that they


"give" you 5 MPH,


That's a far cry from you claiming it was a "requirement" the Pa. police
*give* you the extra speed of a few miles per hour. Nevertheless, you
illustrate once again you speak of things you know nothing of (the law)
and do not need Frank to make you reverse your earlier position. Since
you realized your error, there is no need to provide you with the Pa.
vehicle code. Flip-flop.

You're right.



Most people are when disagreeing you.

I shouldn't have deviated from my original


stance since, as it turns out, I was right about


it.


See:


http://members.aol.com/StatutesP1/75PA3368

.html


Pay particular attention to 3368 (c) number 4.,


which states:


"No person may be convicted upon evidence


obtained through the use of devices


authorized by paragraphs (2) and (3) unless


the speed recorded is six or more miles per


hour in excess of the legal speed limit.



Why did you snip the obvious? I'll tell you why, it directly contradicts
what you claimed.

Furthermore, no person may be convicted


upon evidence obtained through the use of


devices authorized by paragraph (3) in an


area where the legal speed limit is less than


55 miles per hour if the speed recorded is less
than ten miles per hour in excess of the legal


speed limit. This paragraph shall not apply to


evidence obtained through the use of devices


authorized by paragraph (3) within a school


zone"



That there is no rule, unwritten or written that requires the officer to
ignore a speeder. To wit...the portion you conveniently snipped shows
how your claim is not across the board and is an exception, as it
pertains ONLY when traveling in areas with posted speeds LESS than 55,
whereas the the posted interstate (65 MPH) speeds, of which Pa. finally
raised from 55 not too long ago, are the speed LIMITS imposed by the
state of Pennsylvania. Once again, so you are no longer confounded and
suffering and blaming me for your ignorance,, Pa. has no rule OR law,
that requires a LEO to give a window of 5 mph (or ANY speed) to speeders
in excess of the state speed limit, which happens to be 65 MPH.

So what were you saying about knowing the


law?


David T Hall Jr.


"Sandbagger"


Just that you have a devil of a time comprehending it and blame others
for your ignorance.