RadioBanter - View Single Post

February 15th 05, 06:10 PM

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:12:12 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

True to form, you

Ahhh,,,,unable to defend the topic, junior does what all unskilled and
uneducated louts do,,,they attack the chatter. Dave, you have always
been a lid and have one hell of a time debating void of emotion. Get
educated, junior.

show up to pick yet another

bowl of nits.

So sorry you feel persecuted again, Junior, yet, illustrating your
self-contradictory claims has a rather unnerving effect on you. Call it
whatever your bruised ego dictates, you talk sideways.

Nonetheless, you are picking nits. As you

always do.

Pay attention. Pointing to your inability to discuss a topic without
focusing on the poster is presenting an obstacle you have yet to
overcome. Such is the way with those suffering massive communication
deficits.

-
Not relevant. Your claim that is was a requirement degraded to your
current claim it is now a "unwritten" requirement, yet, according to
you, 'friends' of yours are cops who affirmed both your claims. Well,
Dave, you are full of **** again. I posed your question to several LEOs
in a traffic forum and you are wrong. Need the
URL? Care to join me where you can be educated by actual Pa. leos?

That's interesting. Your adoration with me has

made you go through the trouble of actually

seeking out and finding these mythical LEO's,

just to pose this question.

Adoration is you invoking my name over the weekend no less than seven
times when speaking to other newsgroupies about topics of which you are
unable to focus. As you stated
last week, you "prefer" to focus on the chatter as opposed to the topic.
You would "rather" talk about me as opposed to radio, as I fascinate
you, so. Adoration, indeed.

Which you did and got a reply back in less

than a day. Wow.

Actually, I think it came the same day.

I'm sure this "group" in the same place as that

fictitious military group that you tried to snow

Frank with.

But of course, This is the same manner in which you are "sure" roger
beeps are illegal, and that other people among these pages suport such a
learned ignorant contention.

But sure, go ahead and give it to me.

Tell ya' what, Dave..just to keep you honest (and screaming like a
school girl), I'm going to give it to anyone in this group that emails
me and requests it. Of course, you are free to provide for your claim
first, and I will provide for my claim, secondly, to you. I know you
have problems with proper etiquette and communications, but that is the
manner in whcih society operates. Stomping your foot and throwing
tantrums about "twisted did this to me" and "twisted did that to me"
don't cut it, junior. You want claims provided for when you demand,
provide for your own claims you amde first.

If nothing else, it'll be good for a laugh or two.

Not nearly as good as the one that all of amateur radio is enjoying with
you maintaining roger beeps are illegal and that others agree with
you...only, you are struggling with providing for a single person who
agrees with you.
_
No, you haven't been told that by any Pa. cop, and the LEO forum serves
to illustrate your degeneration caused by pathological lies.

Prove it.

You initiated this "prove it" game, you provide for your claim, first.

Provide the URL.

Prediction: nothing will result.

You know yourself, well, Dave, now if only you could learn to like
yourself, you may have a chance at living like normal society does.

David T Hall Jr.

N3CVJ

"Sandbagger"