"Al Patrick" wrote in message
...
Honus wrote:

"Al Patrick" wrote in message
...

Go to http://groups-beta.google.com/grphp?hl=en&tab=wg&q= and do a
search of this news group. Look for the words xian and g-d and you'll
turn up a few of them.


No. Name one. I'm not interested in seeing who uses the spelling xian or
g-d. I'm not interested in wading through all of the posts that have one
of
those words in them, either, in search of someone saying that they look
on
the death of any Christian with glee. I'm interested in hearing -you-
name
someone in this group who "would rejoice at the thoughts of the death of
any
true Christian." Surely you must have had someone in mind? Or a more
specific post to cite?

You want someone else to do ALL your work for you? Besides that, just
because I know something doesn't mean I have to tell YOU! . . . . and
just because you DEMAND it! ;-)

You realize, don't you, that you could have written a name in a fraction of
the time and with a fraction of the effort that it took for you to
demonstrate your inability to support your claims? But of course, that's
redundant. You can't write a name because you can't support your claim.

Besides, I didn't ask for you to do my homework; I asked for -you- to
support -your- allegation. I asked if you had a name in mind. I asked if you
had a specific post that you could cite to bolster your claim.

Your failure is duly noted.

And certainly not unexpected.