"Brian Oakley" wrote in message
...

"Honus" wrote in message
news:8xUSd.54616$uc.51542@trnddc04...

"Brian Oakley" wrote in message
...

"Honus" wrote in message
news:TSSSd.54280$uc.7168@trnddc04...

"Brian Oakley" wrote in message
...

"Honus" wrote in message
news:yOQSd.38101$uc.30945@trnddc08...

"Al Patrick" wrote in message
...

I do know that a few on this group would rejoice at the
thoughts of the death of any true Christian.

Name one.

Dont really need to. They are there. They know who they are. They
are
of
age. Ask them.

I wasn't talking to you, unless you're one of Al Patrick's
sock-puppets.

Gosh, guess only one person can reply to an atheists

I was asking something of a specific individual. He made the statement,
he
can back it up. Since he's the one thinking of particular individuals,
then
he's the only one who can answer the question despite your pathetic need
to
interject on his behalf. Unless of course you think you're some sort of
mind-reader, which would only be par for the course for so many theists.
It
stands to reason that they -must- be able to read minds and see into the
hearts of other people...otherwise, how could they justify being so
judgemental? But of course that doesn't apply to you.

When someone else jumps in to help, you atheists get all frazzeled. If you
cant take the heat...

I'm talking to you, aren't I? Claiming victory when there's none to be
claimed is so sad. Trust me, little one, I can take all of the heat you can
bring. All of it.

Besides, your answer wasn't an answer at all.

Yeah, just pooh pooh it off. What a lame statement.

Yes, just pooh pooh off my observation. _That_ is lame.

post but atheists can
crosspost to every anti-Christian ng on the web and its ok?

Well, duh. If it's an anti-Christian ng, then that's most likely an
appropriate place for an atheist to post. Would you rather they posted
to
PRO-Christian newsgroups? Christ, you guys bitch about -everything-.

Yeah for the effect of virtually shouting someone down in that they cant
reply to every post from every anti-Christian ng on the web. THATS why you
crosspost.

Hey, junior...this is NOT being cross-posted. I deserve an apology. I don't
expect one.

Because thats where all the athiest hang out to bolster each one
in his folly. There arent enough athiests in the world to fill ALL the
ng's
with a majority.

Yes, and I suppose if you had your way there'd be none at all, and not as a
result of peaceful conversion, either. Are you one of those theists that
don't think I should be allowed to live, or participate in government, or
raise my children as I see fit? I come across them every now and then. The
smell's the same. That, by the way, is what's so dangerous about people who
think they know who's a "real christian". You're only safe as far as your
variety is in power. You're foolish enough to not see that.

Er to wit, lets crosspost to those minority athiestic ng's
and make our voice so loud that they will shut up. Yeah, good way to "win"
a
debate and make us look smart. Oh brother.

Are you talking to your dog? Because he's listening about as well as I am,
and that statement probably applies to him as well as it does to me. There's
no cross-posting going on here, just an off-topic flame-fest.

Guess you got an
answer to your question though didn't you?

If my question was is Brian Oakley a dick, then I guess I did indeed.

Again, if ad hominem attacks are the best you can do then I suggest you
find
a different occupation than a professional ng lurker.

Lurker? I've got thousand of Usenet posts to my credit. What's your tally,
and mind you I'm being gracious by ignoring any signal to noise ratio. I
lurk in groups where I'm new, so that I can get a feel for what's acceptable
and what's not, who the players are and so forth. I do it for a time in
groups that I'm new to as a courtesy. I'm not a lurker in this group, and
where you got that twisted idea is beyond me. And yes, that "dick" remark
was ad hominem. I stand by it. What you need to understand is that ad
hominem -by itself- is what's considered weak. It's frowned upon by some
when it's included in an argument, but the argument still stands whether my
voicing my opinion of you bothers you or not. I'll never just call you a
dick. I'll tell you why I think you are one. And for what it's worth, I
don't really consider you to be a dick anymore. I have a different view of
you now.