NNTP-Posting-Date: =A0=A0 Thu, Feb 24, 2005, 1:13pm (EST-1) Group:
=A0=A0 rec.radio.cb Subject: =A0=A0 Dave Hall, this is what you have
been looking for From: =A0=A0 itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
User-Agent: =A0=A0
Xnews/06.08.25 X-No-Archive: =A0=A0 yes Date: =A0=A0 Thu, Feb 24, 2005,
1:13pm (EST-1) X-Trace: =A0=A0
sv3-5kF9M7iyN+gXQ/DXYIFPP44xBFyCplS86IjSuWwwiKsJEHuYHlEthxBCbN8WsO/CnOQENn=
48wNO8ala!xEDKZAhxJgYfZmbvgYWuVtQHcT62xEUgcRjVIVdZ qNk5UozrrnzbZYuJGASMNmhC=

X-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-DMCA-Complaints-To: =A0=A0
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Please be sure to forward
a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Otherwise we will be
unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: =A0=A0 1.3.31
Ok so this should just about end the

discussion, this was sent to me by request

from a Administrative Leo.

There is no hersay

Until this mystery source is cited and ascertained, that's exactly what
it is..hearsay.

here or no web sites. Just actual proof, other

than signed active work zones or school

zones these law are it.


It's not proof because you say so, but let's assume it is, just for the
sake of the thread. Your statement above absolutely contradicts N3CVJ's
claim that one CAN NOT BE CITED for speeding 1 MPH over the limit in Pa.
You deftly illustrate the circumstances where one can be cited for such
an infraction. Staying with assumptions, it would be safe to assume
David T. Hall Jr. knew nothing of the law regarding these exceptions,
therefore, he insists such does not exist, effectively contradicting one
of his favorite claims that "absence of proof is not proof of absence".