NNTP-Posting-Date: =A0=A0 Tue, Mar 1, 2005, 11:21am (EST-1) Group:
=A0=A0 rec.radio.cb Subject: =A0=A0 Dave Hall, this is what you have
been looking for From: Daid T. Hall Jr. =A0=A0
itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
User-Agent: =A0=A0 Xnews/06.08.25 X-No-Archive: =A0=A0 yes Date: =A0=A0
Tue, Mar 1, 2005, 11:21am (EST-1) X-Trace: =A0=A0
sv3-hkCw7Z9N9k+3C9WalHw+W5kegNigPLh6OXQcZry18j9d8WJpc/YnRZKMcCjDOXlSjll979=
AFUQzhWgY!NsOzK/1rWCheb+AMCOXb2w8vDBJyAms1igd2wYeCVwGWbEyUiCCAbg86 wZo1X2ys=
WmDD
X-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-DMCA-Complaints-To: =A0=A0
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Please be sure to forward
a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Otherwise we will be
unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: =A0=A0 1.3.32
(David T. Hall Jr.) wrote in news:9507-42249354-37
Both sentences cite the same law, same paragraph applications, yet have
two separate conclusions. They both can't be right.

LOL you better reread it


You ought try and understand what it is you are wrong about.

your communication deficit has caused you

much grief before and it still does.


I'm not the one citing the law where it very plainly illustrates what
everyone has been trying to tell you. As usual, you are extremely slow
to get it.

If the speed limit is below 55 mph, you cant

get cited for a ticket unless you are caught 10

mph over the speed limit, not 6 in this case.


,,which has nothing at all to do with getting cited when violating the
state's maximum speed limit of 65 MPH,,you know,,on the interstates
where the State Troopers (who are the only ones allowe dto use radar in
Pa) actually use radar and write tickets.

Now go menstrate some more over the facts

because they dont agreee with you.


Pay attention, as that deficit and mild retardation has you getting
angry again, with all those who continue to educate your ignorance:
David T. Hall Jr. (N3CVJ) said he was told by leo's that all speeders in
Pa are to be given a 5 MPH "grace window". You continue to post the
passage of the law that cites the complete pposite of that claim. Again,
one can be cited for going 66 in a 65, yet, you are in dire straits and
drooling incoherently about the law whichi you always demonstrate a
problem comprehending.

I'm still grinning over you invoking yet another mystery. The (read:
un-named) radar manufacturer that you permit to define the definition of
the law. Tell us again about how this radar marketing department came up
with the term "non-radar state" to apply to states that use radar, and
of which you cited as some type of support for your misinterpratations
and plain, rude ignorance.