Chris wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:47:10 -0500, Mike Coslo wrote:

And sonnavagun! You prove my point of the anonymous posters and their
basic incivility. I doubt that you would call me retarded in a face to
face meeting. Yet here you see that as acceptable behavior. Good for
you, Chris!


Of course it was okay when this whole thread got started by one of
your knuckle-dragging, non-anonymous brethren who said "More like
"chicken**** coward by choice" about people who are savvy enough to
remain anonymous for general posting. That was K0HB, the epitomy of
the manners that you seem to think go along with non-anonymous posting.

No, it isn't okay. No one should use bad manners. And that is just a
minor point anyhow. I was attracted to this thread by statements of how
using an anonymous name was going to protect you.

It won't.

The point is that, anonymous or not, bad manners are not predictable
by the anonymity or lack thereof of the poster. That's just your
prejudice speaking to you.

And sonnavagun! You prove by means of your own posts that prejudice is
your forte. Good for you, Mike!

Not the best example of logic, Chris. I never spoke to the manners of
those who would identify themselves. And even that aside, why don't you
compare the typical manners of the aggregate of the anonymous posters. A
large percent make Steve and Hans look like choirboys.

- Mike KB3EIA -