N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
It's been pointed out to you that the FCC maintains
certain
"character" requirements for licensure. They are (obviously)
not
as
strict for Amateur Radio since you remain a Commission
licensee.
Character quifications had nothing to do with it GI JOE.
Who's "GI Joe"...???
And yes, character is very much a part of FCC licensure,
especially in the broadcast services.
Well your wrong, the ONLY reason the FCC dismissed the applications
were because they weren't filed during the Filing Window. If you want
I
post the cover letter on my webpage and you read it for
yourself...that's if you can read.
Sure I can read. It's just that trying to wade through your poor
grammar, incoherant rants and frequent profanities that a challenge
exists.
And you didn't answer my question. Very rude.
Then I suggest YOU take your silly diatribe to
"alt.wannabe.broadcaster.abusing.ham.radio", Todd...Other than the
obvious abuse of priviledge, your rantings have nothing to do with
Amateur Radio.
No but you loosers have to deal with it.
What's a "looser"...?!?!
Deal with what? Your immaturity? Your silly behaviour? Your
rantings? Your misconceptions about applicability of certain Amateur
regulations?
Incompetence IS a legally defensible EXCLUSION from cerain
rights
and priviledges of citizenship, INCLUDING licensure by the Federal
Communications Commission.
OH STEVE, THERE YOU GO AGAIN SAYING I'M IN VIOLATION OTHE
RULES.....YET, HAVE YOU HEARD MY BULLETINS????
Todd...I didn't say you were violating any rule.
I said you're incompetent.
Here it is again: "Incompetence IS a legally defensible EXCLUSION
from certain rights and privileges of citizenship, INCLUDING licensure
by the Federal Communications Commission."
In asserting that I said you were violating rules when that is NOT
what I said clearly demonstrates YOUR incompetence with English
comprehension.
FCC rules and regulations require certain fluency and competency
in English. Obviously there's just one more thing that makes you
ineligible for licensure in the broadcast services.
Since you've apparently admitted that you ARE incompetent,
Todd,
perhaps we should make sure that a copy of this exchange makes it
to
any public hearing wherein your application for a broadcast license
is
subject.
NO, I JUST LIKE ***HOLES WHO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST THE MENTALLY ILL.
So who's discriminating, Todd?
So far, the only ***hole I see is the one who can't express
himself without all the profanity and yelling...which would be you,
Todd.
And by the way, Todd, "incompetence" is STILL a legally defensible
EXCLUSION from certain rights and privileges. It is not
"discrimination". Many laws exist for the SPECIFIC purpose of
preventing the incompetent from causing harm.
So far, you're making a pretty good case for limiting your access
to the airwaves to Amateur Radio...God protect us...
And we can include a copy of your "The FCC is Slime" diatribe
from
your "blog". It would certainly lend credence to the argument that
you
would be an enforcement risk if a broadcast license were issued to
you.
Turst me, i've called the FCC a lot worst to their faces.
"Turst" you?
"...a lot worst"...?!?!
Maybe your behaviour "to their faces" is one of the reasons you're
having to resort to broadcasting on frequencies that are illegal for
broadcasting...?!?!
I "turst" you've made a lasting impression on the Commission,
Todd...One that will, hopefully, prevent you from ever having a
broadcast license.
You certainly take liberties with Amateur regulations. What
makes
anyone believe you'll comply with commercial ones?
You're violating the regulations of the one radio service
you
ARE
a licensee in...WHY in Heaven's name would they waste valuable
COMMERCIAL spectrum on an idiot who can't adhere to AMATEUR
regulations...???
Violating what regulation? as for a I know I've been licensed
sinced
1991-1992 and have not once gotten a fine or a warning letter.
I go 70MPH on the freeway in places where it's marked 65MPH
and
never gotten a speeding ticket.
no my point is your Claiming i'm violating the rules yet you don't
have
the balls to back up your statement.
I've already done it, Todd. Your own words are evidence that
you're violating both the spirit and the letter of the law as it
pertains to broadcasting on the Amateur Radio service.
You're "producing a show"...YOUR words. A "show" is for
entertainment. A "bulletin" is for disseminating timely
news,information and announcements.
yet, you've never heard my
transmission, nor, do you have the balls to explain what rules I'm
"suppose" to be violation.
You've never been to my home, Todd, so how do you know what I have
or have not heard or done?
I know you're doing your best to lose your Amateur license.
i have two forums here and my blog which you
can make your case yet you fail to do so.
There's no "case" for ME to make, Todd. You do it yourself.
You have acknowledged that you are producing a "show" which you
air on a frequency allocated to the Amateur Radio service, and that
this "show" incudes commentary colored with your own opinion.
That takes it out of the realm of a "news bulletin", Todd.
Ask any first year journalism student.
Steve, K4YZ
|